Argumentation  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:28, 2 December 2009
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 16:11, 21 February 2019
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 44: Line 44:
* [[Source criticism]] * [[Source criticism]]
* ''[[Straight and Crooked Thinking]]'' (book) * ''[[Straight and Crooked Thinking]]'' (book)
 +
 +
 +==See also==
 +{{Portal|Psychology}}
 +{{Div col|colwidth=20em}}
 +* [[A fortiori argument]]
 +* [[Argument]]
 +* [[Argumentation ethics]]
 +* [[Criticism]]
 +* [[Defeasible reasoning]]
 +* [[Discourse ethics]]
 +* [[Essentially contested concept]]
 +* [[Forensics]]
 +* [[Legal theory]]
 +* [[Logic and dialectic]]
 +* [[Logic of argumentation]]
 +* [[Negotiation theory]]
 +* [[Pars destruens/pars construens]]
 +* [[Public sphere]]
 +* [[Rationality]]
 +* [[Rhetoric]]
 +* [[Rogerian argument]]
 +* [[Social engineering (political science)]]
 +* [[Social psychology]]
 +* [[Sophistry]]
 +* [[Source criticism]]
 +* ''[[Straight and Crooked Thinking]]''
 +{{Div col end}}
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 16:11, 21 February 2019

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

  1. Inference based on reasoning from given propositions
    His chain of argumentation is flawed.
  2. An exchange of arguments
    Their argumentation continued long into the night.

Key components of argumentation

  • Understanding and identifying arguments, either explicit or implied, and the goals of the participants in the different types of dialogue.
  • Identifying the premises from which conclusions are derived
  • Establishing the "burden of proof" — determining who made the initial claim and is thus responsible for providing evidence why his/her position merits acceptance
  • For the one carrying the "burden of proof", the advocate, to marshal evidence for his/her position in order to convince or force the opponent's acceptance. The method by which this is accomplished is producing valid, sound, and cogent arguments, devoid of weaknesses, and not easily attacked.
  • In a debate, fulfillment of the burden of proof creates a burden of rejoinder. One must try to identify faulty reasoning in the opponent’s argument, to attack the reasons/premises of the argument, to provide counterexamples if possible, to identify any logical fallacies, and to show why a valid conclusion cannot be derived from the reasons provided for his/her argument.

See also


See also

Template:Portal Template:Div col

Template:Div col end




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Argumentation" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools