Argumentation  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:26, 2 December 2009
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-'''Argumentation theory''', or '''argumentation''', is the study of how humans can, do, and should reach conclusions through logical [[reasoning]], that is, claims based on [[premise]]s. It includes the arts and sciences of civil debate, [[dialogue]], conversation, and persuasion. It studies rules of [[inference]], [[logic]], and procedural rules in both [[Artificial intelligence|artificial]] and real world settings. +# [[Inference]] based on [[reasoning]] from given [[proposition]]s
- +#: ''His chain of '''argumentation''' is flawed.''
-Argumentation includes [[debate]] and [[negotiation]] which are concerned with reaching mutually acceptable conclusions. It also encompasses [[eristic]] dialog, the branch of social debate in which victory over an opponent is the primary goal. This art and science is often the means by which people protect their beliefs or self-interests in rational dialogue, in common parlance, and during the process of arguing. +# An [[exchange]] of arguments
- +#: ''Their '''argumentation''' continued long into the night.''
-Argumentation is used in [[law]], for example in trials, in preparing an argument to be presented to a court, and in testing the [[validity]] of certain kinds of evidence. Also, argumentation scholars study the post hoc rationalizations by which organizational actors try to justify decisions they have made irrationally.+
== Key components of argumentation == == Key components of argumentation ==
Line 45: Line 44:
* [[Source criticism]] * [[Source criticism]]
* ''[[Straight and Crooked Thinking]]'' (book) * ''[[Straight and Crooked Thinking]]'' (book)
- 
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Current revision

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

  1. Inference based on reasoning from given propositions
    His chain of argumentation is flawed.
  2. An exchange of arguments
    Their argumentation continued long into the night.

Key components of argumentation

  • Understanding and identifying arguments, either explicit or implied, and the goals of the participants in the different types of dialogue.
  • Identifying the premises from which conclusions are derived
  • Establishing the "burden of proof" — determining who made the initial claim and is thus responsible for providing evidence why his/her position merits acceptance
  • For the one carrying the "burden of proof", the advocate, to marshal evidence for his/her position in order to convince or force the opponent's acceptance. The method by which this is accomplished is producing valid, sound, and cogent arguments, devoid of weaknesses, and not easily attacked.
  • In a debate, fulfillment of the burden of proof creates a burden of rejoinder. One must try to identify faulty reasoning in the opponent’s argument, to attack the reasons/premises of the argument, to provide counterexamples if possible, to identify any logical fallacies, and to show why a valid conclusion cannot be derived from the reasons provided for his/her argument.

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Argumentation" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools