Beauty is a promise of happiness  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 14:40, 22 May 2018
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 14:46, 22 May 2018
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5" {| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
| style="text-align: left;" |[[Immanuel Kant|Kant]]'s famous definition of the [[beauty|beautiful]]. "That is beautiful," says Kant, "which pleases without [[Interest (emotion)|interesting]]." Without interesting! Compare this definition with this other one [...] by [[Stendhal]], who once called the beautiful une ''[[Beauty is a promise of happiness|promesse de bonheur]]''. Here, at any rate, the one point which Kant makes prominent in the aesthetic position is repudiated and eliminated—le [[Disinterestedness|désinteressement]]. Who is right, Kant or Stendhal? --Nietzsche, ''[[On the Genealogy of Morality]]'' | style="text-align: left;" |[[Immanuel Kant|Kant]]'s famous definition of the [[beauty|beautiful]]. "That is beautiful," says Kant, "which pleases without [[Interest (emotion)|interesting]]." Without interesting! Compare this definition with this other one [...] by [[Stendhal]], who once called the beautiful une ''[[Beauty is a promise of happiness|promesse de bonheur]]''. Here, at any rate, the one point which Kant makes prominent in the aesthetic position is repudiated and eliminated—le [[Disinterestedness|désinteressement]]. Who is right, Kant or Stendhal? --Nietzsche, ''[[On the Genealogy of Morality]]''
 +<hr>
 +"Au fond, le livre ''[[On Love (Stendhal)|de L'Amour]]'' se résume en ceci : Les Français sont trop vaniteux; les Anglais sont trop orgueilleux et ont trop su, comme les anciens Romains, persuader à leurs femmes qu'elles doivent s'ennuyer; les Allemands, qui meurent d'envie d'avoir du caractère, sont trop rêve-creux, ils se jettent trop dans leurs imaginations et dans leur philosophie, espèce de folie douce, aimable, et surtout sans fiel. Les républicains d'Amérique adorent trop le ''dieu dollar''; il n'y a d'amour qu'en Italie."
|} |}
[[Image:'Bologne to Rome' page in Stendhal's On Love.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[Stendhal]]'s depiction of the process of [[falling in love]], from ''[[On Love (Stendhal) |On Love]]'', 1822]] [[Image:'Bologne to Rome' page in Stendhal's On Love.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[Stendhal]]'s depiction of the process of [[falling in love]], from ''[[On Love (Stendhal) |On Love]]'', 1822]]

Revision as of 14:46, 22 May 2018

Kant's famous definition of the beautiful. "That is beautiful," says Kant, "which pleases without interesting." Without interesting! Compare this definition with this other one [...] by Stendhal, who once called the beautiful une promesse de bonheur. Here, at any rate, the one point which Kant makes prominent in the aesthetic position is repudiated and eliminated—le désinteressement. Who is right, Kant or Stendhal? --Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality

"Au fond, le livre de L'Amour se résume en ceci : Les Français sont trop vaniteux; les Anglais sont trop orgueilleux et ont trop su, comme les anciens Romains, persuader à leurs femmes qu'elles doivent s'ennuyer; les Allemands, qui meurent d'envie d'avoir du caractère, sont trop rêve-creux, ils se jettent trop dans leurs imaginations et dans leur philosophie, espèce de folie douce, aimable, et surtout sans fiel. Les républicains d'Amérique adorent trop le dieu dollar; il n'y a d'amour qu'en Italie."

Stendhal's depiction of the process of falling in love, from On Love, 1822
Enlarge
Stendhal's depiction of the process of falling in love, from On Love, 1822

Related e

Google
Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Wiki Commons
Wikiquote
Wikisource
YouTube
Shop


Featured:
Train wreck at Montparnasse (October 22, 1895) by Studio Lévy and Sons.
Enlarge
Train wreck at Montparnasse (October 22, 1895) by Studio Lévy and Sons.

"La beauté est une promesse de bonheur" (English: Beauty is a promise of happiness) is a dictum by Stendhal. It was first published as a footnote in his treatise On Love (1822).

It is often misattributed to Edmund Burke.

The title of Only A Promise of Happiness (2008) references the dictum.




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Beauty is a promise of happiness" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on original research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools