Copulation  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:30, 6 January 2014
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 18:30, 6 January 2014
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5" {| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
| style="text-align: left;" | | style="text-align: left;" |
-"But the [[copula]] of terms is no less irritating than the copulation of bodies. And when I scream I AM THE SUN an integral [[erection]] results, because the verb to be is the vehicle of amorous [[frenzy]]." --''[[The Solar Anus ]]'' - [[Georges Bataille]]+"But the [[Copula (linguistics)|copula]] of terms is no less irritating than the [[copulation]] of bodies. And when I scream I AM THE SUN an integral [[erection]] results, because the verb to be is the vehicle of amorous [[frenzy]]." --''[[The Solar Anus ]]'' - [[Georges Bataille]]
|} |}

Revision as of 18:30, 6 January 2014

"But the copula of terms is no less irritating than the copulation of bodies. And when I scream I AM THE SUN an integral erection results, because the verb to be is the vehicle of amorous frenzy." --The Solar Anus - Georges Bataille

Fashionable Contrasts (1792) by James Gillray   As well as being blatant in his observations, James Gillray could be incredibly subtle, and puncture vanity with a remarkably deft approach. The outstanding example of this is his print Fashionable Contrasts;—or—The Duchess's little Shoe yeilding [sic] to the Magnitude of the Duke's Foot. This was a devastating image aimed at the ridiculous sycophancy directed by the press towards Frederica Charlotte Ulrica, Duchess of York, and the supposed daintiness of her feet. The print showed only the feet and ankles of the Duke and Duchess of York, in an obviously copulatory position, with the Duke's feet enlarged and the Duchess's feet drawn very small. This print silenced forever the sycophancy of the press regarding the union of the Duke and Duchess.
Enlarge
Fashionable Contrasts (1792) by James Gillray
As well as being blatant in his observations, James Gillray could be incredibly subtle, and puncture vanity with a remarkably deft approach. The outstanding example of this is his print Fashionable Contrasts;—or—The Duchess's little Shoe yeilding [sic] to the Magnitude of the Duke's Foot. This was a devastating image aimed at the ridiculous sycophancy directed by the press towards Frederica Charlotte Ulrica, Duchess of York, and the supposed daintiness of her feet. The print showed only the feet and ankles of the Duke and Duchess of York, in an obviously copulatory position, with the Duke's feet enlarged and the Duchess's feet drawn very small. This print silenced forever the sycophancy of the press regarding the union of the Duke and Duchess.

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

  1. The act of coupling or joining; union; conjunction.
  2. The coming together of male and female in the act of generation; sexual intercourse; coition.

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Copulation" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools