Disinterestedness  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:26, 22 January 2014
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 15:59, 5 April 2014
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5" {| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
-| style="text-align: left;" |[[Immanuel Kant|Kant]]'s famous definition of the [[beauty|beautiful]]. "That is beautiful," says Kant, "which pleases without [[Interest (emotion)|interesting]]." Without interesting! Compare this definition with this other one [..] by [[Stendhal]], who once called the beautiful une ''[[La beauté est une promesse de bonheur|promesse de bonheur]]''. Here, at any rate, the one point which Kant makes prominent in the aesthetic position is repudiated and eliminated—le [[Disinterestedness|désinteressement]]. Who is right, Kant or Stendhal? --Nietzsche, ''[[On the Genealogy of Morality]]''+| style="text-align: left;" |[[Immanuel Kant|Kant]]'s famous definition of the [[beauty|beautiful]]. "That is beautiful," says Kant, "which pleases without [[Interest (emotion)|interesting]]." Without interesting! Compare this definition with this other one [...] by [[Stendhal]], who once called the beautiful une ''[[La beauté est une promesse de bonheur|promesse de bonheur]]''. Here, at any rate, the one point which Kant makes prominent in the aesthetic position is repudiated and eliminated—le [[Disinterestedness|désinteressement]]. Who is right, Kant or Stendhal? --Nietzsche, ''[[On the Genealogy of Morality]]''
|} |}
[[Image:L'indifférent-1- (1717) is an oil on canvas (26x19cm) painted by Antoine Watteau.jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[L'indifférent]]'' (1717) by [[Antoine Watteau]]]]{{Template}} [[Image:L'indifférent-1- (1717) is an oil on canvas (26x19cm) painted by Antoine Watteau.jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[L'indifférent]]'' (1717) by [[Antoine Watteau]]]]{{Template}}

Revision as of 15:59, 5 April 2014

Kant's famous definition of the beautiful. "That is beautiful," says Kant, "which pleases without interesting." Without interesting! Compare this definition with this other one [...] by Stendhal, who once called the beautiful une promesse de bonheur. Here, at any rate, the one point which Kant makes prominent in the aesthetic position is repudiated and eliminated—le désinteressement. Who is right, Kant or Stendhal? --Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Disinterestedness (German: "Gleichgültigkeit" or "ohne interesse") is a key term in the aesthetics of Immanuel Kant.

J. H. Bernard in the introduction to Critique of Judgment said that "[Kant] declares that the aesthetical judgement about Beauty is according to quality disinterested ; a point which had been laid down by such different writers as Hutcheson and Moses Mendelssohn."

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Disinterestedness" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools