Eros and Civilization  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 08:11, 19 July 2007
WikiSysop (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 08:11, 19 July 2007
WikiSysop (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
-{{Template}}'''Eros and Civilization''' is one of [[Herbert Marcuse]]'s best known works. Written in [[1955]], it is a synthesis of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Sigmund Freud]]. Its title alludes to Freud's ''[[Civilization and Its Discontents]]''. Marcuse's vision of a non-repressive society, based on Marx and Freud, anticipated the values of [[1960s]] [[counterculture|countercultural]] [[social movements]].+{{Template}}'''Eros and Civilization''' is one of [[Herbert Marcuse]]'s best known works. Written in [[1955]], it is a synthesis of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Sigmund Freud]]. Its title alludes to Freud's ''[[Civilization and Its Discontents]]''. Marcuse's vision of a non-repressive society, based on Marx and Freud, anticipated the values of [[1960s]] [[counterculture|countercultural]] [[social movement]]s.
In the book, Marcuse writes about the social meaning of biology - history seen not as a [[class struggle]], but fight against repression of our instincts. He argues that [[capitalism]] (if never named as such) is preventing us from reaching the non-repressive society "based on a fundamentally different experience of being, a fundamentally different relation between man and nature, and fundamentally different existential relations". He argues that Freud's contention that repression ''is'' necessary for civilisation to persist is ill-founded - instead of being destructive, Marcuse considers that a liberated eros is upbuilding. In the book, Marcuse writes about the social meaning of biology - history seen not as a [[class struggle]], but fight against repression of our instincts. He argues that [[capitalism]] (if never named as such) is preventing us from reaching the non-repressive society "based on a fundamentally different experience of being, a fundamentally different relation between man and nature, and fundamentally different existential relations". He argues that Freud's contention that repression ''is'' necessary for civilisation to persist is ill-founded - instead of being destructive, Marcuse considers that a liberated eros is upbuilding.

Revision as of 08:11, 19 July 2007

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Eros and Civilization is one of Herbert Marcuse's best known works. Written in 1955, it is a synthesis of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. Its title alludes to Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents. Marcuse's vision of a non-repressive society, based on Marx and Freud, anticipated the values of 1960s countercultural social movements.

In the book, Marcuse writes about the social meaning of biology - history seen not as a class struggle, but fight against repression of our instincts. He argues that capitalism (if never named as such) is preventing us from reaching the non-repressive society "based on a fundamentally different experience of being, a fundamentally different relation between man and nature, and fundamentally different existential relations". He argues that Freud's contention that repression is necessary for civilisation to persist is ill-founded - instead of being destructive, Marcuse considers that a liberated eros is upbuilding.

Marcuse starts with the conflict postulated by Freud in "Civilisation and Its Discontents" - the struggle between human instincts and the repression brought on by the socially-tuned conscience (aka superego). Freud claimed that biological clash between Eros and civilisation is inevitable and results in the history of man being one of his repression: 'Our civilisation is, generally speaking, founded on the suppression of instincts.' Sex produces the energy, and it is repressed so the energy can be channeled into progress - but the price of progress is the prevalence of guilt instead of happiness. "Progress", for Marcuse, is a concept to rationalise the perpetuation of the prevailing system into the future, an end to which the happiness of people in the present (and the pleasure principle is all about the present) is sacrificed.

Marcuse argues that 'the irreconcilable conflict is not between work (reality principle - life without leisure) and Eros (pleasure principle - leisure and pleasure), but between alienated labour (performance principle - economic stratification) and Eros.' Sex is allowed for 'the betters' (capitalists...), and for workers only when not disturbing performance. He believes that a socialist society could change this by replacing the 'alienated labor' with "non-alienated libidinal work" thus resulting in "a non-repressive civilisation based on 'non-repressive sublimation'". In other words, Marcuse believes that a socialist society could be a society without needing the performance of the 'poor' and without as strong a suppression of our drives as in today's society.

The argument depends on the assumption that repression is largely an historical phenomenon (history of humankind is that of repression). Marcuse concludes that biological repression itself is not the problem but that our troubles stem from the additional 'surplus repression' produced by the specific historical institutions of our own period. The result is a philosophy that is a merger of Freud and Marx, or what one reviewer called an 'eroticized Marx'[1].

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Eros and Civilization" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools