Fountain (Duchamp)  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 10:30, 24 July 2010
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 10:32, 24 July 2010
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 2: Line 2:
'''''Fountain''''' is a [[1917]] work by [[Marcel Duchamp]]. It is one of the pieces which he called ''[[Readymades of Marcel Duchamp|readymades]]'' (also known as ''[[found art]]''), because he made use of an already existing object—in this case a [[urinal]], which he titled ''Fountain'' and signed ''R. Mutt.'' It was submitted to an [[art show]] as an act of [[provocation]], but was lost shortly after this. It is a major [[landmark]] in [[20th century art]]. Replicas commissioned by Duchamp in the 1960s are now on display in museums. '''''Fountain''''' is a [[1917]] work by [[Marcel Duchamp]]. It is one of the pieces which he called ''[[Readymades of Marcel Duchamp|readymades]]'' (also known as ''[[found art]]''), because he made use of an already existing object—in this case a [[urinal]], which he titled ''Fountain'' and signed ''R. Mutt.'' It was submitted to an [[art show]] as an act of [[provocation]], but was lost shortly after this. It is a major [[landmark]] in [[20th century art]]. Replicas commissioned by Duchamp in the 1960s are now on display in museums.
==Legacy== ==Legacy==
-In December 2004, Duchamp's ''Fountain'' was voted the most influential artwork of the 20th century by 500 selected British art world professionals.<ref>{{cite news|title=Duchamp's urinal tops art survey|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4059997.stm|publisher=[[BBC News]]|date=2004-12-01}}</ref> ''[[The Independent]]'' noted in a February 2008 article that with this single work, Duchamp invented [[conceptual art]] and "severed forever the traditional link between the artist's labour and the merit of the work".<ref name="Independent">{{cite news|last=Hensher|first=Philip|title=The loo that shook the world: Duchamp, Man Ray, Picabi|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art-and-architecture/features/the-loo-that-shook-the-world-duchamp-man-ray-picabi-784384.html|publisher=''[[The Independent]]'' (''Extra'')|date=2008-02-20|pages=2&ndash;5 | location=London}}</ref>+In December 2004, Duchamp's ''Fountain'' was voted the most influential artwork of the 20th century by 500 selected British art world professionals. ''[[The Independent]]'' noted in a February 2008 article that with this single work, Duchamp invented [[conceptual art]] and "severed forever the traditional link between the artist's labour and the merit of the work".
-Jerry Saltz wrote in ''[[The Village Voice]]'' in 2006:+[[Jerry Saltz]] wrote in ''[[The Village Voice]]'' in 2006:
-{{quote|Duchamp adamantly asserted that he wanted to "de-deify" the artist. The readymades provide a way around inflexible either-or aesthetic propositions. They represent a Copernican shift in art. Fountain is what's called an "acheropoietoi," [''sic''] an image not shaped by the hands of an artist. Fountain brings us into contact with an original that is still an original but that also exists in an altered philosophical and metaphysical state. It is a manifestation of the Kantian sublime: A work of art that transcends a form but that is also intelligible, an object that strikes down an idea while allowing it to spring up stronger.<ref name=villagevoiceIdol/>}}+:"Duchamp adamantly asserted that he wanted to "de-deify" the artist. The readymades provide a way around inflexible either-or aesthetic propositions. They represent a Copernican shift in art. Fountain is what's called an "acheropoietoi," [''sic''] an image not shaped by the hands of an artist. Fountain brings us into contact with an original that is still an original but that also exists in an altered philosophical and metaphysical state. It is a manifestation of the Kantian sublime: A work of art that transcends a form but that is also intelligible, an object that strikes down an idea while allowing it to spring up stronger."
-The prices for replicas, editions, or works that have some ephemeral trace of Duchamp reached its peak with the purchase of one of the 1964 replicas of "Fountain" from the 1964 edition of eight, for $1.7 million at Sotheby's in November 1999. <ref>Marquis, ''Marcel Duchamp: The Bachelor Stripped Bare A Biography'', p. 5.</ref>+The prices for replicas, editions, or works that have some ephemeral trace of Duchamp reached its peak with the purchase of one of the 1964 replicas of "Fountain" from the 1964 edition of eight, for $1.7 million at Sotheby's in November 1999.
===Interventions=== ===Interventions===
-[[Image:Marcel Duchamp Fountain at Tate Modern by David Shankbone.jpg|thumb|''Fountain'' 1917; 1964 artist-authorized replica made by the artist's dealer, [[Arturo Schwarz]], based on a photograph by [[Alfred Stieglitz]]. Porcelain, 360 x 480 x 610 mm. [[Tate Modern]], London.]] 
-Swedish artist Björn Kjelltoft urinated in the Fountain at [[Moderna Museet]] in Stockholm in 1999. <ref>[http://hem.passagen.se/gkrantz/ett/artiklar/kjell.html ÅRETS STÖRSTA KONSTHÄNDELSE]</ref>+Swedish artist Björn Kjelltoft urinated in the Fountain at [[Moderna Museet]] in Stockholm in 1999.
-In spring 2000, [[Yuan Chai and Jian Jun Xi]], two performance artists, who in 1999 had jumped on [[Tracey Emin]]'s installation-sculpture ''[[My Bed]]'' in the [[Turner Prize]] exhibition at [[Tate Britain]], went to the newly opened Tate Modern and urinated on the ''Fountain'' which was on display. However, they were prevented from soiling the sculpture directly by its [[Acrylic glass|Perspex]] case. The Tate, which denied that the duo had succeeded in urinating into the sculpture itself,<ref>{{cite web|title=Tate focus for artistic debate|url=http://www.hatii.arts.gla.ac.uk/MultimediaStudentProjects/00-01/9704524l/MM%20Project/Html/badly3.htm|publisher=[[Press Association]] (referred to on the website of the Humanities Advanced Technology & Information Institute, [[University of Glasgow]])|date=2000-05-21|accessdate=2008-02-17}}</ref> banned them from the premises stating that they were threatening "works of art and our staff." When asked why they felt they had to add to Duchamp's work, Chai said, "The urinal is there &ndash; it's an invitation. As Duchamp said himself, it's the artist's choice. He chooses what is art. We just added to it."<ref name="Independent"/>+In spring 2000, [[Yuan Chai and Jian Jun Xi]], two performance artists, who in 1999 had jumped on [[Tracey Emin]]'s installation-sculpture ''[[My Bed]]'' in the [[Turner Prize]] exhibition at [[Tate Britain]], went to the newly opened Tate Modern and urinated on the ''Fountain'' which was on display. However, they were prevented from soiling the sculpture directly by its [[Acrylic glass|Perspex]] case. The Tate, which denied that the duo had succeeded in urinating into the sculpture itself, banned them from the premises stating that they were threatening "works of art and our staff." When asked why they felt they had to add to Duchamp's work, Chai said, "The urinal is there &ndash; it's an invitation. As Duchamp said himself, it's the artist's choice. He chooses what is art. We just added to it."
-On January 4, 2006, while on display in the Dada show in the [[Pompidou Centre]] in Paris, ''Fountain'' was attacked by [[Pierre Pinoncelli]], a then 76 year old <ref>[http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20060212191356996 "Pierre Pinoncelli: This man is not an artist" at infoshop.org ]</ref> French performance artist, with a hammer causing a slight chip. Pinoncelli, who was arrested, said the attack was a work of [[performance art]] that Marcel Duchamp himself would have appreciated.<ref name=bbcpinocelli>{{cite news|title=Man held for hitting urinal work|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4587988.stm|publisher=[[BBC News]]|date=2006-01-06}}</ref> In 1993 Pinoncelli urinated into the piece while it was on display in Nimes, in southern France. Both of Pinoncelli's performances derive from [[neo-Dada]]ists' and [[Viennese Actionism|Viennese Actionists']] [[intervention]] or [[manoeuvre]].{{Citation needed|date=March 2007}}+On January 4, 2006, while on display in the Dada show in the [[Pompidou Centre]] in Paris, ''Fountain'' was attacked by [[Pierre Pinoncelli]], a then 76 year old French performance artist, with a hammer causing a slight chip. Pinoncelli, who was arrested, said the attack was a work of [[performance art]] that Marcel Duchamp himself would have appreciated. In 1993 Pinoncelli urinated into the piece while it was on display in Nimes, in southern France. Both of Pinoncelli's performances derive from [[neo-Dada]]ists' and [[Viennese Actionism|Viennese Actionists']] [[intervention]] or [[manoeuvre]].{{Citation needed|date=March 2007}}
===Afterword=== ===Afterword===
Duchamp is often misquoted as saying: Duchamp is often misquoted as saying:
-{{quote|This Neo-Dada, which they call New Realism, Pop Art, Assemblage, etc., is an easy way out, and lives on what Dada did. When I discovered the ready-mades I sought to discourage [[aesthetics]]. In Neo-Dada they have taken my readymades and found aesthetic beauty in them, I threw the bottle-rack and the urinal into their faces as a challenge and now they admire them for their aesthetic beauty.}}+:"This Neo-Dada, which they call New Realism, Pop Art, Assemblage, etc., is an easy way out, and lives on what Dada did. When I discovered the ready-mades I sought to discourage [[aesthetics]]. In Neo-Dada they have taken my readymades and found aesthetic beauty in them, I threw the bottle-rack and the urinal into their faces as a challenge and now they admire them for their aesthetic beauty."
- +
-However, fellow Dadaist [[Hans Richter (artist)|Hans Richter]] explained years later that it was in a letter he had written to Duchamp in 1961, except in the second person not the first, i.e. "You threw..." etc. Duchamp had written in French, "Ok, ça va très bien" ("Ok, that's going very well") in the margin beside it.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Girst|first=Thomas|title=(Ab)Using Marcel Duchamp: The concept of the Readymade in post-War and contemporary American art|url=http://www.toutfait.com/issues/volume2/issue_5/articles/girst2/girst1.html|journal=Tout-fait: the Marcel Duchamp Studies Online Journal|issue=5|date=April 2003|postscript=<!--None-->}}.</ref>+
 +However, fellow Dadaist [[Hans Richter (artist)|Hans Richter]] explained years later that it was in a letter he had written to Duchamp in 1961, except in the second person not the first, i.e. "You threw..." etc. Duchamp had written in French, "Ok, ça va très bien" ("Ok, that's going very well") in the margin beside it.
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 10:32, 24 July 2010

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Fountain is a 1917 work by Marcel Duchamp. It is one of the pieces which he called readymades (also known as found art), because he made use of an already existing object—in this case a urinal, which he titled Fountain and signed R. Mutt. It was submitted to an art show as an act of provocation, but was lost shortly after this. It is a major landmark in 20th century art. Replicas commissioned by Duchamp in the 1960s are now on display in museums.

Legacy

In December 2004, Duchamp's Fountain was voted the most influential artwork of the 20th century by 500 selected British art world professionals. The Independent noted in a February 2008 article that with this single work, Duchamp invented conceptual art and "severed forever the traditional link between the artist's labour and the merit of the work".

Jerry Saltz wrote in The Village Voice in 2006:

"Duchamp adamantly asserted that he wanted to "de-deify" the artist. The readymades provide a way around inflexible either-or aesthetic propositions. They represent a Copernican shift in art. Fountain is what's called an "acheropoietoi," [sic] an image not shaped by the hands of an artist. Fountain brings us into contact with an original that is still an original but that also exists in an altered philosophical and metaphysical state. It is a manifestation of the Kantian sublime: A work of art that transcends a form but that is also intelligible, an object that strikes down an idea while allowing it to spring up stronger."

The prices for replicas, editions, or works that have some ephemeral trace of Duchamp reached its peak with the purchase of one of the 1964 replicas of "Fountain" from the 1964 edition of eight, for $1.7 million at Sotheby's in November 1999.

Interventions

Swedish artist Björn Kjelltoft urinated in the Fountain at Moderna Museet in Stockholm in 1999.

In spring 2000, Yuan Chai and Jian Jun Xi, two performance artists, who in 1999 had jumped on Tracey Emin's installation-sculpture My Bed in the Turner Prize exhibition at Tate Britain, went to the newly opened Tate Modern and urinated on the Fountain which was on display. However, they were prevented from soiling the sculpture directly by its Perspex case. The Tate, which denied that the duo had succeeded in urinating into the sculpture itself, banned them from the premises stating that they were threatening "works of art and our staff." When asked why they felt they had to add to Duchamp's work, Chai said, "The urinal is there – it's an invitation. As Duchamp said himself, it's the artist's choice. He chooses what is art. We just added to it."

On January 4, 2006, while on display in the Dada show in the Pompidou Centre in Paris, Fountain was attacked by Pierre Pinoncelli, a then 76 year old French performance artist, with a hammer causing a slight chip. Pinoncelli, who was arrested, said the attack was a work of performance art that Marcel Duchamp himself would have appreciated. In 1993 Pinoncelli urinated into the piece while it was on display in Nimes, in southern France. Both of Pinoncelli's performances derive from neo-Dadaists' and Viennese Actionists' intervention or manoeuvre.Template:Citation needed

Afterword

Duchamp is often misquoted as saying:

"This Neo-Dada, which they call New Realism, Pop Art, Assemblage, etc., is an easy way out, and lives on what Dada did. When I discovered the ready-mades I sought to discourage aesthetics. In Neo-Dada they have taken my readymades and found aesthetic beauty in them, I threw the bottle-rack and the urinal into their faces as a challenge and now they admire them for their aesthetic beauty."

However, fellow Dadaist Hans Richter explained years later that it was in a letter he had written to Duchamp in 1961, except in the second person not the first, i.e. "You threw..." etc. Duchamp had written in French, "Ok, ça va très bien" ("Ok, that's going very well") in the margin beside it.



Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Fountain (Duchamp)" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools