Late capitalism  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 20:27, 20 March 2020
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Line 2: Line 2:
| style="text-align: left;" | | style="text-align: left;" |
"As old as the tension between [[art music]] and [[Vernacular music|vulgar music]] is, it became radical only in [[late capitalism|high capitalism]]. In earlier epochs, art music was able to regenerate its material from time to time and enlarge its sphere by recourse to vulgar music. This is seen in [[medieval music|medieval polyphony]], which drew upon [[folk music|folk song]]s for its ''[[Cantus firmus|cantus firmi]]'', and also in [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]], when he combined [[peep show|peep-show]] cosmology with [[opera seria]] and [[Singspiel]]."--"[[On the Social Situation of Music]]" (1932) by Theodor Adorno "As old as the tension between [[art music]] and [[Vernacular music|vulgar music]] is, it became radical only in [[late capitalism|high capitalism]]. In earlier epochs, art music was able to regenerate its material from time to time and enlarge its sphere by recourse to vulgar music. This is seen in [[medieval music|medieval polyphony]], which drew upon [[folk music|folk song]]s for its ''[[Cantus firmus|cantus firmi]]'', and also in [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart|Mozart]], when he combined [[peep show|peep-show]] cosmology with [[opera seria]] and [[Singspiel]]."--"[[On the Social Situation of Music]]" (1932) by Theodor Adorno
 +<hr>
 +"[[Late capitalism]] is a [[Pyramid scheme|pyramid racket]] on a global scale...getting the suckers to believe it's all gonna go on forever."--''[[Bleeding Edge]]'' (2013) by Thomas Pynchon
|} |}
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-"'''Late capitalism'''" is a term sometimes used to refer to [[capitalism]] of the [[second half of the 20th century]], generally with the implication that it is historically limited, and will eventually end. Within this structure, capitalism has colonized every aspect of life, [[commodification|turning everything into a commodity]] or transaction. Late capitalism is also an important component of [[Fredric Jameson]]'s ''[[Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]]'', an influential cultural analysis of [[postmodernism]].  
-== Overview ==+'''Late capitalism''', or '''Late-stage capitalism''', is a term first used in print by German economist [[Werner Sombart]] around the turn of the 20th century. Since 2016, the term has been used in the United States and Canada to refer to perceived absurdities, contradictions, crises, injustices, and inequality created by modern business development.
-This idea has its origin in [[Karl Marx]]'s judgement that the [[capitalist mode of production]], like any other [[mode of production]], is in the broad sweep of history a limited and transient phenomenon, rather than being the natural, ever-lasting condition for human life. Thus, it can be periodized in terms of its historical emergence, its heyday, and its subsequent phase of decline and disappearance.+Later capitalism refers to the historical epoch since 1940, including the [[Post–World War II economic expansion]] called the [[golden age of capitalism]]. The expression already existed for a long time in continental Europe, before it gained currency in the English-speaking world through the English translation of [[Ernest Mandel]]'s book ''Late Capitalism'', published in 1975.
-However, the notion of late capitalism is partly an ideological perspective, insofar as we simply do not know now when exactly capitalism will end, or if it will end. In addition, the global pattern of capitalist development has been extremely uneven; some regions have barely reached the stage of "early capitalism".+The German original edition of Mandel's work was subtitled "an attempt at an explanation", meaning that Mandel tried to provide an orthodox [[Marxist]] explanation of the post-war epoch in terms of Marx's theory of [[capitalism]]. Mandel suggested that important qualitative changes occurred within the capitalist system during and after World War II and that there are limits to capitalist development.
-In general, [[Karl Marx]] seems to have believed&mdash;as a generalization&mdash;that no [[mode of production]] disappears until it has developed all the [[productive forces]] which it can contain within its social [[relations of production]]. Technologies would ultimately become incompatible with the existing social framework, causing that social framework to break down, and a new social framework to emerge. According to [[Rosa Luxemburg]], that could mean an "advance" to [[socialism]] or a relapse into [[barbarism]].+==History of the term==
 +The term "late capitalism" was first used by [[Werner Sombart]] in his magnum opus ''[[Der Moderne Kapitalismus]]'', which was published from 1902 through 1927, and subsequent writings; Sombart divided capitalism into different stages: (1) proto-capitalist society from the early middle ages up to 1500 AD, (2) early capitalism in 1500–1800, (3) the heyday of capitalism (''Hochkapitalismus'') from 1800 to the first World War, and (4) late capitalism since then. Sombart's work was never translated into English, but historians sometimes do refer to ''late [[bourgeois society]]'' in contrast to ''early bourgeois society'' in the 17th and 18th century, or ''classical bourgeois society'' in the 19th and early 20th century.
-Capitalism has proved to be a flexible and adaptive system, able to survive terrible catastrophes including two world wars and an enormous number of smaller wars - suggesting, for many thinkers, that the end is not yet near. [[Lenin]] opined that there were no absolutely hopeless situations for capitalism; its fate depended on the outcome of [[class struggle]]. This, however, does not deter critics of the system, who point to various alleged signs of the system's social decay on a world scale.+[[Vladimir Lenin]] famously declared that there are no "absolutely hopeless situations" for capitalism. The [[Communist International]] stated that with the first World War, a new world epoch of wars and revolutions had opened, and it defined [[state monopoly capitalism]] as the highest and final stage of capitalism.
-But there are also others who argue that capitalism has already been superseded; in a modern [[information society]] the old industrial system is a thing of the past, and the reference to capitalism is an [[anachronism]] (although Marx never defined capitalism as being purely industrial).+The term ''late capitalism'' began to be used by socialists in continental Europe towards the end of the 1930s and in the 1940s, when many economists believed capitalism was doomed.
-==Origin of the term== +At the end of [[World War II]], many economists, including [[Joseph Schumpeter]] and [[Paul Samuelson]], believed the end of capitalism could be near, in that the economic problems might be insurmountable.
-The term "late capitalism" came into use in Europe towards the end of the 1930s when many economists believed capitalism was doomed (see, for example, [[Natalia Moszkowska]]'s ''Zur Dynamik des Spätkapitalismus''. Zurich: Verlag Der Aufbruch, 1943) and it was used in the 1960s particularly in Germany and Austria, among others by Marxists writing in the tradition of the [[Frankfurt School]] and [[Austromarxism]]. At the end of the [[second world war]], many economists including [[Paul K. Samuelson]] and [[Joseph Schumpeter]] believed the end of capitalism could well be nigh, in that the economic problems might be insurmountable.+The term was used in the 1960s in Germany and Austria, by Western Marxists writing in the tradition of the [[Frankfurt School]] and [[Austromarxism]].
 +Leo Michielsen and [[Andre Gorz]] popularized the term "neo-capitalism" in France and Belgium, with new analyses of the new post-war capitalism. [[Jacques Derrida]] preferred ''[[neo-capitalism]]'' to ''post-'' or ''late-capitalism''. [[Theodor Adorno]] preferred "late capitalism" over "industrial society," which was the theme of the 16th Congress of German Sociologists in 1968. In 1971, [[Leo Kofler]] published a book called ''Technologische Rationalität im Spätkapitalismus'' (Technological Rationality in Late Capitalism).
 +[[Claus Offe]] published his essay "Spätkapitalismus - Versuch einer Begriffsbestimmung" (Late capitalism - attempt at a conceptual definition) in 1972.
 +
 +In 1973, [[Jürgen Habermas]] published his ''Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus'' (Legitimacy problems in late capitalism).
-According to the [[Marxist]] economist [[Ernest Mandel]], who popularised the term with his 1972 Phd dissertation, late-stage capitalism will be dominated by the machinations - or perhaps better, fluidities - of [[financial capital]]. +In 1975, [[Ernest Mandel]] published his PhD thesis ''Late Capitalism'' in English at [[New Left Books]].
 +[[Herbert Marcuse]] also accepted the term.
-In the tradition of the [[orthodox Marxism|classical Marxists]], Mandel tried to characterize the nature of the modern epoch as a whole, with reference to the main laws of motion of capitalism specified by Marx, in order to show how the same forces which boosted profitability after the world war must ultimately turn into their dialectical opposites, and cause its decline. Mandel's aim was to explain the unexpected revival of capitalism after the [[Second World War]], and a long economic boom which showed the fastest economic growth ever seen in human history. +[[Immanuel Wallerstein]] believes that capitalism may be in the process of being replaced by another [[world-systems theory|world system]]. The American literary critic and cultural theorist [[Frederic Jameson]] thought [[Rudolf Hilferding]]'s term ''the latest stage of capitalism'' (''jüngster Kapitalismus'') perhaps more prudent and less prophetic-sounding but Jameson often used "late capitalism" in his writings.
 +Hegel's theme of "the end of history" was rekindled by [[Kojève]] in his ''Introduction to the Reading of Hegel''. The "[[The End of History|end of history]]" is discussed by [[Francis Fukuyama]] in the sense that [[liberal democracy]] is the ultimate form of society, which cannot be surpassed by anything that is superior to it, because there does not and cannot exist anything superior.
 +In modern usage, late capitalism often refers to a new mix of high-tech advances, the concentration of (speculative) financial capital, [[Post-Fordism]], and a growing gap between rich and poor.
-For Mandel, profitability could be influenced by numerous different factors, and was only the general indicator of the condition of the system as a whole; his critics (such as [[Paul Mattick]]) however argued that Mandel is too eclectic, and failed to give an orthodox Marxist explanation of the famous "[[tendency of the rate of profit to fall]]". +==Mandel==
 +According to the [[Marxist]] economist [[Ernest Mandel]], who popularised the term with his 1972 PhD dissertation, late-stage capitalism will be dominated by the machinations—or perhaps better, fluidities—of [[financial capital]]; and also by the increasing [[commodification]] and [[industrialisation]] of ever more inclusive sectors of human life. Mandel believed that
-Whereas Mandel organised his explanation of the long boom mainly in terms of factors counteracting the falling rate of profit, he did not distinguish clearly between the rate and volume of profit and considered effective demand an important variable. This invited the accusation that Mandel subscribed to a theory of [[underconsumptionism]], i.e. attributing crisis phenomena to a lack of buying power by workers. Such an approach, it was argued, is conducive to a reformist redistribution of wealth, rather than total revolution.+:"Far from representing a 'post-industrial society', late capitalism... constitutes ''generalized universal industrialization'' for the first time in history".
-Other critics, such as the [[Marxism-Leninism|Marxist-Leninist]]s, preferred the concept of [[state monopoly capitalism]], or reject any periodisation of capitalism in terms of "early" and "late" stages as unscientific.+Up to the mid-1960s, Mandel preferred to use the term "neo-capitalism", which was most often used by intellectuals in Belgium and France around that time. This term drew attention to new characterististics of capitalism, but at the time ultra-leftist Marxists objected to it, because, according to them, it might suggest that capitalism was no longer capitalism, and it might lead to reformist errors rather than the overthrow of capitalism.
-The American literary critic and cultural theorist, [[Fredric Jameson]], also used Mandel's third stage designation as the point of departure for his widely-cited ''Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,'' in which, among other issues, Jameson argues that this period involves an emergence of a Cultural Dominant or Mode of Cultural Production which differs markedly in its various manifestations (Jameson comments on developments in Literature, Film, Fine Art, Video, Social Theory, etc.) from those of its predecessor, referred to collectively and broadly as Modernism, mainly in its treatment of "subject position," temporality and narrative.+In his work ''Late Capitalism'', Mandel distinguished three periods in the development of the [[capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)|capitalist mode of production]].
 +*''Freely competitive capitalist production'', roughly from 1700 to 1870, through the growth of industrial capital in domestic markets.
 +*The phase of ''monopoly capitalism'', roughly from 1870 to 1940, and is characterized by the [[imperialism|imperialist]] competition for international markets, and the exploitation of [[colony|colonial territories]].
 +*The epoch of ''late capitalism'' emerging out of the [[Second World War]], which has as its dominant features the [[multinational corporation]], [[globalization|globalized markets and labor]], [[consumerism|mass consumption]], and the space of liquid multinational [[capital flows|flows of capital]].
-==Cultural critique==+In the tradition of the [[orthodox Marxism|classical Marxists]], Mandel tried to characterize the nature of the modern epoch as a whole, with reference to the main laws of motion of capitalism specified by Marx. Mandel's aim was to explain the unexpected revival of capitalism after World War II, contrary to leftist prognostications, and the long economic boom which showed the fastest economic growth ever seen in human history. His work has produced a new interest in the theory of [[long waves]] in economic development.
-Late capitalism is also an important component of [[Fredric Jameson]]'s influential cultural analysis of [[postmodernism]]. A section of Jameson's [http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/jameson.htm analysis] in ''[[Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]]'' has been reproduced on the [[Marxists Internet Archive]]. +== Fredric Jameson==
-The theme of ''[[the end of history]]'', recalling an idea from [[Hegel]], was rekindled by A. [[Kojève]] in his ''Introduction to the Reading of Hegel'' (1980). It is discussed by [[Francis Fukuyama]] in a book of the same name, and criticised by [[Frank Furedi]]+[[Fredric Jameson]] borrowed Mandel's vision as a basis for his widely cited ''[[Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]]. '' Jameson's [[postmodernity]] involves a new mode of cultural production (developments in literature, film, fine art, video, social theory, etc.) which differs markedly from the preceding era of [[Modernism]], particularly in its treatment of subject position, temporality and narrative.
-[http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/00000006D8EE.htm.]+
-A related term is ''late [[bourgeois society]]'' as contrasted with ''early bourgeois society'' in the 17th and 18th century, and ''classical bourgeois society'' in the 19th and early 20th century.+In the modernist era, the dominant ideology was that society could be re-engineered on the basis of scientific and technical knowledge, and on the basis of a popular consensus about the meaning of progress. From the second half of the 20th century, however, modernism was gradually eclipsed by postmodernism, which is skeptical about social engineering and features a lack of consensus about the meaning of progress. In the wake of rapid technological and social change, all the old certainties have broken down. This begins to destabilize every part of life, making almost everything malleable, changeable, transient and impermanent.
-==See also== +Jameson argues that "every position on postmodernism today — whether apologia or stigmatization — is also...''necessarily'' an implicitly or explicitly political stance on the nature of multinational capitalism today".
-*[[periodizations of capitalism]] and [[state monopoly capitalism]].+A section of Jameson's ''[[Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]]'' regards the late capitalist stage as a new and previously unparalleled development with a global reach — whether defined as a multinational or informational capitalism. At the same time, late capitalism diverges from Marx's prognosis for the final stage of capitalism.
 + 
 +==In popular culture==
 +A character in [[Thomas Pynchon]]'s novel ''[[Bleeding Edge]]'' states: "late capitalism is a [[Pyramid scheme|pyramid racket]] on a global scale...getting the suckers to believe it's all gonna go on forever."
 + 
 +According to a 2017 article in ''[[The Atlantic]]'', the term "late capitalism" is again in vogue to describe modern business culture, although with a semantic change or an ironic twist. "Late capitalism" has become a catch-all term for various phenomena that express capitalism's distortions of human life, and it is often used in critique and satire. This usage also conveys a sense that contemporary capitalism cannot go on like it does forever, because the problems created by business are getting too large and unmanageable.
 + 
 +==See also==
*[[Advanced capitalism]] *[[Advanced capitalism]]
 +*[[Deindustrialization]]
 +*[[Financialization]]
 +*[[Late modernity]]
 +*[[New media]]
 +*[[Periodizations of capitalism]]
*[[Post-industrial society]] *[[Post-industrial society]]
 +* ''[[The Limits to Growth]]''
 +*[[Supercapitalism (modern)|Supercapitalism]]
*[[Wall Street]] *[[Wall Street]]
- +*[[Global financial system]]
 +*[[Great Regression]]
 +*[[Societal collapse]]
 +*[[Surveillance capitalism]]
 +*[[High-frequency trading]]
 +*[[Neoliberalism]]
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Current revision

"As old as the tension between art music and vulgar music is, it became radical only in high capitalism. In earlier epochs, art music was able to regenerate its material from time to time and enlarge its sphere by recourse to vulgar music. This is seen in medieval polyphony, which drew upon folk songs for its cantus firmi, and also in Mozart, when he combined peep-show cosmology with opera seria and Singspiel."--"On the Social Situation of Music" (1932) by Theodor Adorno


"Late capitalism is a pyramid racket on a global scale...getting the suckers to believe it's all gonna go on forever."--Bleeding Edge (2013) by Thomas Pynchon

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Late capitalism, or Late-stage capitalism, is a term first used in print by German economist Werner Sombart around the turn of the 20th century. Since 2016, the term has been used in the United States and Canada to refer to perceived absurdities, contradictions, crises, injustices, and inequality created by modern business development.

Later capitalism refers to the historical epoch since 1940, including the Post–World War II economic expansion called the golden age of capitalism. The expression already existed for a long time in continental Europe, before it gained currency in the English-speaking world through the English translation of Ernest Mandel's book Late Capitalism, published in 1975.

The German original edition of Mandel's work was subtitled "an attempt at an explanation", meaning that Mandel tried to provide an orthodox Marxist explanation of the post-war epoch in terms of Marx's theory of capitalism. Mandel suggested that important qualitative changes occurred within the capitalist system during and after World War II and that there are limits to capitalist development.

Contents

History of the term

The term "late capitalism" was first used by Werner Sombart in his magnum opus Der Moderne Kapitalismus, which was published from 1902 through 1927, and subsequent writings; Sombart divided capitalism into different stages: (1) proto-capitalist society from the early middle ages up to 1500 AD, (2) early capitalism in 1500–1800, (3) the heyday of capitalism (Hochkapitalismus) from 1800 to the first World War, and (4) late capitalism since then. Sombart's work was never translated into English, but historians sometimes do refer to late bourgeois society in contrast to early bourgeois society in the 17th and 18th century, or classical bourgeois society in the 19th and early 20th century.

Vladimir Lenin famously declared that there are no "absolutely hopeless situations" for capitalism. The Communist International stated that with the first World War, a new world epoch of wars and revolutions had opened, and it defined state monopoly capitalism as the highest and final stage of capitalism.

The term late capitalism began to be used by socialists in continental Europe towards the end of the 1930s and in the 1940s, when many economists believed capitalism was doomed.

At the end of World War II, many economists, including Joseph Schumpeter and Paul Samuelson, believed the end of capitalism could be near, in that the economic problems might be insurmountable.

The term was used in the 1960s in Germany and Austria, by Western Marxists writing in the tradition of the Frankfurt School and Austromarxism. Leo Michielsen and Andre Gorz popularized the term "neo-capitalism" in France and Belgium, with new analyses of the new post-war capitalism. Jacques Derrida preferred neo-capitalism to post- or late-capitalism. Theodor Adorno preferred "late capitalism" over "industrial society," which was the theme of the 16th Congress of German Sociologists in 1968. In 1971, Leo Kofler published a book called Technologische Rationalität im Spätkapitalismus (Technological Rationality in Late Capitalism). Claus Offe published his essay "Spätkapitalismus - Versuch einer Begriffsbestimmung" (Late capitalism - attempt at a conceptual definition) in 1972.

In 1973, Jürgen Habermas published his Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus (Legitimacy problems in late capitalism).

In 1975, Ernest Mandel published his PhD thesis Late Capitalism in English at New Left Books. Herbert Marcuse also accepted the term.

Immanuel Wallerstein believes that capitalism may be in the process of being replaced by another world system. The American literary critic and cultural theorist Frederic Jameson thought Rudolf Hilferding's term the latest stage of capitalism (jüngster Kapitalismus) perhaps more prudent and less prophetic-sounding but Jameson often used "late capitalism" in his writings. Hegel's theme of "the end of history" was rekindled by Kojève in his Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. The "end of history" is discussed by Francis Fukuyama in the sense that liberal democracy is the ultimate form of society, which cannot be surpassed by anything that is superior to it, because there does not and cannot exist anything superior. In modern usage, late capitalism often refers to a new mix of high-tech advances, the concentration of (speculative) financial capital, Post-Fordism, and a growing gap between rich and poor.

Mandel

According to the Marxist economist Ernest Mandel, who popularised the term with his 1972 PhD dissertation, late-stage capitalism will be dominated by the machinations—or perhaps better, fluidities—of financial capital; and also by the increasing commodification and industrialisation of ever more inclusive sectors of human life. Mandel believed that

"Far from representing a 'post-industrial society', late capitalism... constitutes generalized universal industrialization for the first time in history".

Up to the mid-1960s, Mandel preferred to use the term "neo-capitalism", which was most often used by intellectuals in Belgium and France around that time. This term drew attention to new characterististics of capitalism, but at the time ultra-leftist Marxists objected to it, because, according to them, it might suggest that capitalism was no longer capitalism, and it might lead to reformist errors rather than the overthrow of capitalism.

In his work Late Capitalism, Mandel distinguished three periods in the development of the capitalist mode of production.

In the tradition of the classical Marxists, Mandel tried to characterize the nature of the modern epoch as a whole, with reference to the main laws of motion of capitalism specified by Marx. Mandel's aim was to explain the unexpected revival of capitalism after World War II, contrary to leftist prognostications, and the long economic boom which showed the fastest economic growth ever seen in human history. His work has produced a new interest in the theory of long waves in economic development.

Fredric Jameson

Fredric Jameson borrowed Mandel's vision as a basis for his widely cited Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Jameson's postmodernity involves a new mode of cultural production (developments in literature, film, fine art, video, social theory, etc.) which differs markedly from the preceding era of Modernism, particularly in its treatment of subject position, temporality and narrative.

In the modernist era, the dominant ideology was that society could be re-engineered on the basis of scientific and technical knowledge, and on the basis of a popular consensus about the meaning of progress. From the second half of the 20th century, however, modernism was gradually eclipsed by postmodernism, which is skeptical about social engineering and features a lack of consensus about the meaning of progress. In the wake of rapid technological and social change, all the old certainties have broken down. This begins to destabilize every part of life, making almost everything malleable, changeable, transient and impermanent.

Jameson argues that "every position on postmodernism today — whether apologia or stigmatization — is also...necessarily an implicitly or explicitly political stance on the nature of multinational capitalism today".

A section of Jameson's Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism regards the late capitalist stage as a new and previously unparalleled development with a global reach — whether defined as a multinational or informational capitalism. At the same time, late capitalism diverges from Marx's prognosis for the final stage of capitalism.

In popular culture

A character in Thomas Pynchon's novel Bleeding Edge states: "late capitalism is a pyramid racket on a global scale...getting the suckers to believe it's all gonna go on forever."

According to a 2017 article in The Atlantic, the term "late capitalism" is again in vogue to describe modern business culture, although with a semantic change or an ironic twist. "Late capitalism" has become a catch-all term for various phenomena that express capitalism's distortions of human life, and it is often used in critique and satire. This usage also conveys a sense that contemporary capitalism cannot go on like it does forever, because the problems created by business are getting too large and unmanageable.

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Late capitalism" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools