Literary merit  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 17:05, 15 April 2007
WikiSysop (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 17:06, 15 April 2007
WikiSysop (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template}} {{Template}}
 +'''Literary merit''' is a quality of written work, generally applied to the genre of [[literary fiction]]. A work is said to have literary merit (to be a [[work (fine arts)|work of art]]) if it is a work of [[quality]], that is if it has some [[aesthetic]] value. The concept is important in [[law]] because it is used to decide, for example, if a text is [[pornography|pornographic]] in nature (if a text has literary merit then it is usually held to be non-pornographic).
 +
 +== Criticisms ==
 +
 +It has long been noted that the concept of "literary merit" is practically impossible to define, and it is hard to see how such an idea can be used with any precision or consistency by policy makers, [[magistrates]] or [[judges]]. A common response to this criticism is that, while the process of establishing literary merit is difficult, fraught with dangers, and often subjective, it is the only method currently available to separate work that has significant cultural value from work that is ephemeral and essentially worthless.
 +
 +== See also ==
 +*[[Artistic merit]]
 +*[[Western canon]]
 +*[[Lady Chatterley's Lover]]

Revision as of 17:06, 15 April 2007

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Literary merit is a quality of written work, generally applied to the genre of literary fiction. A work is said to have literary merit (to be a work of art) if it is a work of quality, that is if it has some aesthetic value. The concept is important in law because it is used to decide, for example, if a text is pornographic in nature (if a text has literary merit then it is usually held to be non-pornographic).

Criticisms

It has long been noted that the concept of "literary merit" is practically impossible to define, and it is hard to see how such an idea can be used with any precision or consistency by policy makers, magistrates or judges. A common response to this criticism is that, while the process of establishing literary merit is difficult, fraught with dangers, and often subjective, it is the only method currently available to separate work that has significant cultural value from work that is ephemeral and essentially worthless.

See also

Personal tools