Madame Bovary trial
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 05:56, 1 October 2014 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 05:57, 1 October 2014 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| On January 31, 1857, in a courtroom at Paris's imposing [[Palais de Justice]], [[Antoine Sénard]] rose to make his case for ''[[Madame Bovary]]''. The [[public prosecutor]] was [[Ernest Pinard]]. | On January 31, 1857, in a courtroom at Paris's imposing [[Palais de Justice]], [[Antoine Sénard]] rose to make his case for ''[[Madame Bovary]]''. The [[public prosecutor]] was [[Ernest Pinard]]. | ||
| - | The novel is a prime example of [[Literary realism|Realism]], a fact which contributed to the trial for obscenity (which was a politically-motivated attack by the government on the liberal newspaper in which it was being serialized, ''La Revue de Paris''). Flaubert, as the author of the story, does not comment directly on the moral character of Emma Bovary and abstains from explicitly condemning her adultery. This decision caused some to accuse Flaubert of glorifying adultery and creating a scandal. | + | The novel is a prime example of [[Literary realism|Realism]], a fact which contributed to the trial for obscenity (which was a politically-motivated attack by the government on the liberal newspaper in which it was being serialized, ''[[La Revue de Paris]]''). Flaubert, as the author of the story, does not comment directly on the moral character of Emma Bovary and abstains from explicitly condemning her [[adultery]]. This decision caused some to accuse Flaubert of glorifying adultery and creating a scandal. |
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 05:57, 1 October 2014
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
On January 31, 1857, in a courtroom at Paris's imposing Palais de Justice, Antoine Sénard rose to make his case for Madame Bovary. The public prosecutor was Ernest Pinard.
The novel is a prime example of Realism, a fact which contributed to the trial for obscenity (which was a politically-motivated attack by the government on the liberal newspaper in which it was being serialized, La Revue de Paris). Flaubert, as the author of the story, does not comment directly on the moral character of Emma Bovary and abstains from explicitly condemning her adultery. This decision caused some to accuse Flaubert of glorifying adultery and creating a scandal.
See also
- La plaidoirie de Maitre Senard
- The carriage ride with Léon Dupuis in Madame Bovary
- Full text of the Madame Bovary trial
- The Public vs. M. Gustave Flaubert
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Madame Bovary trial" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.
