Madame Bovary trial  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 09:14, 1 October 2015
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)
(Madame Bovary's trial moved to Madame Bovary trial)
← Previous diff
Current revision
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Line 1: Line 1:
 +{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
 +| style="text-align: left;" |
 +"This code of morals stigmatizes [[realistic literature]], not because it paints the passions: hatred, vengeance, love—the world sees but the surface and art should paint them—but not paint them without bridle, without limits. Art without rules is not art. It is like a woman who discards all clothing. To impose upon art the one rule of public decency is not to subject it, not to dishonor it. One grows great only by rule. These, gentlemen, are the principles which we profess, this the doctrine which we defend with conscience." --[[Ernest Pinard]]
 +<hr>
 +"Reassured upon the value of [[Madame Bovary|the book]], encouraged, furthermore, by the most eminent men of the press, M. [[Gustave Flaubert|Flaubert]] thought only of printing it and giving it to the public. I repeat: everyone was unanimous in rendering homage to its [[literary merit]], to its style, and at the same time to the excellent thought that pervaded it, from the first line to the last." --[[Antoine Sénard]]
 +|}
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-On January 31, 1857, in a courtroom at Paris's imposing [[Palais de Justice]], [[Antoine Sénard]] rose to make his case for ''[[Madame Bovary]]''. The [[public prosecutor]] was [[Ernest Pinard]].+On January 29[http://www.bovary.fr/dossiers/roman/proces.html], 1857, in a courtroom at Paris's imposing [[Palais de Justice, Paris|Palais de Justice]], public prosecutor [[Ernest Pinard]] rose to make his case against'' [[Madame Bovary]]''. The lawyer of Flaubert was [[Antoine Sénard]].
The novel is a prime example of [[Literary realism|Realism]], a fact which contributed to the trial for obscenity (which was a politically-motivated attack by the government on the liberal newspaper in which it was being serialized, ''[[La Revue de Paris]]''). Flaubert, as the author of the story, does not comment directly on the moral character of Emma Bovary and abstains from explicitly condemning her [[adultery]]. This decision caused some to accuse Flaubert of glorifying adultery and creating a scandal. The novel is a prime example of [[Literary realism|Realism]], a fact which contributed to the trial for obscenity (which was a politically-motivated attack by the government on the liberal newspaper in which it was being serialized, ''[[La Revue de Paris]]''). Flaubert, as the author of the story, does not comment directly on the moral character of Emma Bovary and abstains from explicitly condemning her [[adultery]]. This decision caused some to accuse Flaubert of glorifying adultery and creating a scandal.
==See also== ==See also==
-*[[La plaidoirie de Maitre Senard]] 
*[[The carriage ride with Léon Dupuis in Madame Bovary ]] *[[The carriage ride with Léon Dupuis in Madame Bovary ]]
*[[Full text of the Madame Bovary trial]] *[[Full text of the Madame Bovary trial]]
*[[The Public vs. M. Gustave Flaubert]] *[[The Public vs. M. Gustave Flaubert]]
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Current revision

"This code of morals stigmatizes realistic literature, not because it paints the passions: hatred, vengeance, love—the world sees but the surface and art should paint them—but not paint them without bridle, without limits. Art without rules is not art. It is like a woman who discards all clothing. To impose upon art the one rule of public decency is not to subject it, not to dishonor it. One grows great only by rule. These, gentlemen, are the principles which we profess, this the doctrine which we defend with conscience." --Ernest Pinard


"Reassured upon the value of the book, encouraged, furthermore, by the most eminent men of the press, M. Flaubert thought only of printing it and giving it to the public. I repeat: everyone was unanimous in rendering homage to its literary merit, to its style, and at the same time to the excellent thought that pervaded it, from the first line to the last." --Antoine Sénard

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

On January 29[1], 1857, in a courtroom at Paris's imposing Palais de Justice, public prosecutor Ernest Pinard rose to make his case against Madame Bovary. The lawyer of Flaubert was Antoine Sénard.

The novel is a prime example of Realism, a fact which contributed to the trial for obscenity (which was a politically-motivated attack by the government on the liberal newspaper in which it was being serialized, La Revue de Paris). Flaubert, as the author of the story, does not comment directly on the moral character of Emma Bovary and abstains from explicitly condemning her adultery. This decision caused some to accuse Flaubert of glorifying adultery and creating a scandal.

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Madame Bovary trial" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools