Mutual exclusivity  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 08:37, 29 April 2018
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 08:37, 29 April 2018
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
-v+{{Template}}
 + 
 +'''Pigeonholing''' is any process that attempts to [[classification|classify]] [[disparate]] [[entity|entities]] into a small number of [[Category|categories]] (usually, [[Mutual exclusivity|mutually exclusive]] ones).
 + 
 +The term usually carries connotations of criticism, implying that the classification scheme referred to inadequately reflects the entities being sorted, or that it is based on [[stereotype]]s.
 + 
 +Common failings of pigeonholing schemes include:
 + 
 +*Categories are poorly defined (often because they are [[Subjectivity|subjective]]).
 +*Entities may be suited to more than one category. Example: [[rhubarb]] is both 'poisonous' and 'edible'.
 +*Entities may not fit into any available category. Example: asking somebody from [[Washington, DC]] which state they live in.
 +*Entities may change over time, so they no longer fit the category in which they have been placed. Example: certain species of [[fish]] may change from male to female during their life.
 +*Attempting to discretize properties that would be better viewed as a [[continuum (theory)|continuum]]. Example: attempting to sort people into '[[Extraversion and introversion|introverted]]' and '[[Extraversion and introversion|extroverted]]'.
 +*Criteria used to categorize entities do not accurately predict the properties ascribed to those categories. Example: relying on [[astrological sign]] as a guide to someone's personality.
 + 
 +==See also==
 +* [[Archetype]]
 +* [[Labelling]]
 +* [[Pigeonhole principle]]
 +* [[Typecasting (acting)]]
 + 
 +{{GFDL}}

Revision as of 08:37, 29 April 2018

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Pigeonholing is any process that attempts to classify disparate entities into a small number of categories (usually, mutually exclusive ones).

The term usually carries connotations of criticism, implying that the classification scheme referred to inadequately reflects the entities being sorted, or that it is based on stereotypes.

Common failings of pigeonholing schemes include:

  • Categories are poorly defined (often because they are subjective).
  • Entities may be suited to more than one category. Example: rhubarb is both 'poisonous' and 'edible'.
  • Entities may not fit into any available category. Example: asking somebody from Washington, DC which state they live in.
  • Entities may change over time, so they no longer fit the category in which they have been placed. Example: certain species of fish may change from male to female during their life.
  • Attempting to discretize properties that would be better viewed as a continuum. Example: attempting to sort people into 'introverted' and 'extroverted'.
  • Criteria used to categorize entities do not accurately predict the properties ascribed to those categories. Example: relying on astrological sign as a guide to someone's personality.

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Mutual exclusivity" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools