Neo-Freudianism  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 11:46, 31 July 2010
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 11:49, 31 July 2010
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-The term '''Madonna-whore complex''' refers to a [[Complex (psychology)|psychological complex]] in [[Sigmund Freud|Freudian]] [[psychoanalysis]] that is said to develop in the [[male sexuality|human male]]. The term is also used popularly, often with subtly different meanings.+The '''Neo-Freudian''' [[psychiatrists]] and [[psychology|psychologists]] were a group of loosely linked American theorists of the mid-twentieth century, who were all influenced by [[Sigmund Freud]], but who extended his theories, often in social or cultural directions.
-According to Freudian psychology, this complex often develops when the sufferer is raised by a [[cold and distant mother]]. Such a man will often court [[women]] with qualities of his mother, hoping to fulfill a need for [[intimacy]] unmet in [[childhood]]. Often, the [[wife]] begins to be seen as mother to the [[husband]] — a [[Madonna (art)|Madonna]] figure — and thus not a possible object of [[sexual attraction]]. For this reason, in the mind of the sufferer [[love]] and [[sex]] cannot be mixed, and the [[man]] is reluctant to have sexual relations with his wife, for that, he thinks unconsciously, would be as [[incest]]. He will reserve sexuality for "[[bad woman|bad]]" or "[[dirty]]" women, and will not develop "normal" feelings of love in these sexual relationships.+==Other Dissidents and Post-Freudians==
-Popularly, the term is used to describe an unsatisfiable desire by a man to have his wife or other female partner exhibit both of these mutually exclusive traits. This introduces a dilemma where men may feel unable to love any women that can satisfy them sexually and are unable to be sexually satisfied by any women that they can love. Alternatively, the term is to describe or attempt to justify the behavior of men who pursue multiple women as a way of fulfilling each of these needs.+The term Neo-Freudian is sometimes, but incorrectly, used to cover all those who at some time in their career accepted the basic tenets of Freud's theory of [[psychoanalysis]] but later dissented from it, such as [[Alfred Adler]] or [[Carl Jung|Jung]], figures who are perhaps better thought of as dissidents.
-==See also==+The 'Independent Analysts' Group of the British Psycho-Analytical Society, as distinct from the Kleinians and what are now called the Contemporary Freudians', who include figures such as Christopher Bollas, [[D. W. Winnicott]] and Adam Phillips, are - like the [[Ego psychology|ego-psychologists]] such as [[Heinz Hartmann]] or the intersubjectivist analysts in the States - perhaps best considered of as 'different schools of psychoanalytic thought'.
-*[[Racism]]+
-*[[Marianismo]]+
-*[[Misogyny]]+
-*[[Sexism]]+
-*[[Neo-Freudian]]+
-*[[Masculinism]]+
-*[[Machismo]]+
-*[[Sexually liberal feminism]]+
-*''[[Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema]]'', a feminist essay by Laura Mulvey on the male gaze.+
-*''[[The Mother and the Whore]]'', a French film+
-*[[Femme fatale]]+
-*[[Whore]]+
-*[[Mother]]+
 +It was only in a jocular way that one might have spoken in the Eighties of 'today's ''nouvelle vague'' neo-Freudians, [[Otto Kernberg|Kernberg]] and [[Heinz Kohut|Kohut]]'.
 +
 +==Neo-Freudian Ideas==
 +
 +An interest in the social approach to psychodynamics was the major theme linking the so-called Neo-Freudians. Adler had perhaps been 'the first to explore and develop a comprehensive social theory of the psychodynamic self'; and 'after Adler's death, some of his views...came to exert considerable influence on neo-Freudian theory'.
 +
 +As early as 1932, however, Fromm had been independently regretting that psychoanalysts 'did not concern themselves with the variety of life experience...and therefore did not try to explain psychic structure as determined by social structure'.
 +
 +Horney too 'emphasised the role culture exerts in the development of personality and downplayed the classical driven features outlined by Freud'.
 +
 +Erikson for his part stressed that 'psychoanalysis today is...shifting its emphasis...to the study of the ego's roots in social organisation', and that its method should be 'what H. S. Sullivan called "participant", and systematically so'.
 +
 +Through informal as well as institutional links, as well as likeness of ideas, the Neo-Freudians made up a cohesively distinctive and influential psychodynamic movement.
 +
 +==Criticism==
 +
 +'[[Herbert Marcuse]], in his "Critique of Neo-Freudian Revisionism"...icily examines the tone of uplift and the Power of Positive Thinking that pervades the revisionists' writings, and mocks their claims to scientific seriousness'.
 +
 +Similarly 'an article...by Mr [[Edward Glover]], entitled ''Freudian or Neo-Freudian'', directed entirely against the constructions of Mr Alexander' equally used the term as a form of orthodox reproach.
 +
 +In the wake of such contemporary criticism, a 'consistent critique levelled at most theorists cited above is that they compromise the intrapersonal interiority of the psyche', but one may accept nonetheless that 'they have contributed an enduring and vital collection of standpoints relating to the human subject'.
 +
 +==Successors==
 +
 +Whether by direct or indirect influence, 'consistent with the traditions of these schools, current theorists of the social and psychodynamic self are working in the spaces between social and political theory and psychoanalysis (Wolfenstein 1993; Chodorow 1994; Hinshelwood 1996).
 +
 +==Cultural Offshoots==
 +
 +In his skit on Freud's remark that 'if my name were Oberhuber, my innovations would have found far less resistance', [[Peter Gay]], considering the notional eclipse of "Oberhuber" by his replacement Freud, adjudged that 'the prospect that deviants would have to be called neo-Oberhuberians, or Oberhuberian revisionists, contributed to the master's decline'.
 +
 +==Neo-Freudian Psychologists==
 +
 +* [[Erik Erikson]] * [[Karen Horney]] * [[Erich Fromm]] * [[Frieda Fromm-Reichmann]] * [[Harry Stack Sullivan]] * [[Clara Thompson]]
 +
 +==Others with Possible Neo-Freudian Links==
 +* [[Jessica Benjamin]] * [[Nancy Chodorow]] * [[Richard Hakim]] * [[Thomas Ogden]] * [[David Rapaport]] * [[Alex Unger]] * [[Mark Blechner]]
 +
 +==Related publications==
 +* Thompson, Clara M. (1950). ''Psychoanalysis: Evolution and development''. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
 +
 +* Mitchell, S.A., & Black M.J. (1995). ''Freud and beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought.'' USA: Basic Books.
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 11:49, 31 July 2010

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

The Neo-Freudian psychiatrists and psychologists were a group of loosely linked American theorists of the mid-twentieth century, who were all influenced by Sigmund Freud, but who extended his theories, often in social or cultural directions.

Contents

Other Dissidents and Post-Freudians

The term Neo-Freudian is sometimes, but incorrectly, used to cover all those who at some time in their career accepted the basic tenets of Freud's theory of psychoanalysis but later dissented from it, such as Alfred Adler or Jung, figures who are perhaps better thought of as dissidents.

The 'Independent Analysts' Group of the British Psycho-Analytical Society, as distinct from the Kleinians and what are now called the Contemporary Freudians', who include figures such as Christopher Bollas, D. W. Winnicott and Adam Phillips, are - like the ego-psychologists such as Heinz Hartmann or the intersubjectivist analysts in the States - perhaps best considered of as 'different schools of psychoanalytic thought'.

It was only in a jocular way that one might have spoken in the Eighties of 'today's nouvelle vague neo-Freudians, Kernberg and Kohut'.

Neo-Freudian Ideas

An interest in the social approach to psychodynamics was the major theme linking the so-called Neo-Freudians. Adler had perhaps been 'the first to explore and develop a comprehensive social theory of the psychodynamic self'; and 'after Adler's death, some of his views...came to exert considerable influence on neo-Freudian theory'.

As early as 1932, however, Fromm had been independently regretting that psychoanalysts 'did not concern themselves with the variety of life experience...and therefore did not try to explain psychic structure as determined by social structure'.

Horney too 'emphasised the role culture exerts in the development of personality and downplayed the classical driven features outlined by Freud'.

Erikson for his part stressed that 'psychoanalysis today is...shifting its emphasis...to the study of the ego's roots in social organisation', and that its method should be 'what H. S. Sullivan called "participant", and systematically so'.

Through informal as well as institutional links, as well as likeness of ideas, the Neo-Freudians made up a cohesively distinctive and influential psychodynamic movement.

Criticism

'Herbert Marcuse, in his "Critique of Neo-Freudian Revisionism"...icily examines the tone of uplift and the Power of Positive Thinking that pervades the revisionists' writings, and mocks their claims to scientific seriousness'.

Similarly 'an article...by Mr Edward Glover, entitled Freudian or Neo-Freudian, directed entirely against the constructions of Mr Alexander' equally used the term as a form of orthodox reproach.

In the wake of such contemporary criticism, a 'consistent critique levelled at most theorists cited above is that they compromise the intrapersonal interiority of the psyche', but one may accept nonetheless that 'they have contributed an enduring and vital collection of standpoints relating to the human subject'.

Successors

Whether by direct or indirect influence, 'consistent with the traditions of these schools, current theorists of the social and psychodynamic self are working in the spaces between social and political theory and psychoanalysis (Wolfenstein 1993; Chodorow 1994; Hinshelwood 1996).

Cultural Offshoots

In his skit on Freud's remark that 'if my name were Oberhuber, my innovations would have found far less resistance', Peter Gay, considering the notional eclipse of "Oberhuber" by his replacement Freud, adjudged that 'the prospect that deviants would have to be called neo-Oberhuberians, or Oberhuberian revisionists, contributed to the master's decline'.

Neo-Freudian Psychologists

Others with Possible Neo-Freudian Links

Related publications

  • Thompson, Clara M. (1950). Psychoanalysis: Evolution and development. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
  • Mitchell, S.A., & Black M.J. (1995). Freud and beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought. USA: Basic Books.




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Neo-Freudianism" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools