Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 13:21, 2 August 2008
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Line 1: Line 1:
 +{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
 +| style="text-align: left;" | "[[No monster exists that cannot be made pleasing through art]]"
 +<hr>
 +"[[Rien n'est beau que le vrai; le vrai seul est aimable]]"
 +|}
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-The '''quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns''' ([[French language|French]]: ''querelle des Anciens et des Modernes'') was a [[literature|literary]] and artistic quarrel that heated up in the early [[1690s]] and shook the [[Académie française]]. It opposed two sides: 
-* the Ancients (''Anciens''), led by [[Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux|Boileau]], who supported the merits of the ancient writers and contended that a writer could do no better than imitate the great examples that had been fixed for all time. By constraining his choice of subjects to those drawn from the literature of [[Classical antiquity|Antiquity]], [[Jean Racine]] showed himself as much one of the Ancients, as his restriction of his tragedies to the [[classical unities]] derived by the [[neoclassicism|neoclassicists]] from [[Aristotle]]'s ''[[Poetics (Aristotle)|Poetics]]'': the unities of place, of time&mdash;a single day&mdash; and of action.+'''Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux''' (1 November 1636 – 13 March 1711) was a [[French poet]] and [[critic]].
-* the Moderns (''Modernes''), who opened fire first, with [[Charles Perrault|Perrault]]'s '"Le siècle de Louis le Grand"' ("The Century of Louis the Great," 1687), in which he supported the merits of the authors of the century of [[Louis XIV of France|Louis XIV]] and expressed the Moderns' stance in a nutshell:+Boileau did much to reform the prevailing form of French poetry, as [[Blaise Pascal]] did to reform the prose. He was greatly influenced by [[Horace]]. He is best-known for his ''[[Traité du sublime. Réflexions critiques sur Longin]]'', ''[[L'Art poétique (Boileau)|L'Art poétique]]'' and a number of dicta.
 +==Overview==
 +The surname "[[Despréaux (disambiguation)|Despréaux]]" was derived from a small property at [[Crosne, Essonne|Crosne]] near [[Villeneuve-Saint-Georges]]. He was the fifteenth child of Gilles Boileau, a clerk in the ''parlement''. Two of his brothers attained some distinction: [[Gilles Boileau]], the author of a translation of [[Epictetus]]; and [[Jacques Boileau]], who became a canon of the [[Sainte-Chapelle]], and made valuable contributions to church history. His mother died when he was two years old; and Nicolas Boileau, who had a delicate constitution, seems to have suffered something from want of care.
-:''La docte Antiquité dans toute sa durée+[[Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve|Sainte-Beuve]] puts down his somewhat hard and unsympathetic outlook quite as much to the uninspiring circumstances of these days as to the general character of his time. He cannot be said to have been early disenchanted, for he never seems to have had any illusions; he grew up with a single passion, "the hatred of stupid books." He was educated at the Collège de Beauvais, and was then sent to study [[theology]] at the [[Collège de Sorbonne|Sorbonne]]. He exchanged theology for [[law]], however, and was called to the bar on December 4, 1656. From the profession of law, after a short trial, he recoiled in disgust, complaining bitterly of the amount of chicanery which passed under the name of law and justice. His father died in 1657, leaving him a small fortune, and thenceforward he devoted himself to letters.
-:''A l'égal de nos jours ne fut point éclairée."+==Biography==
 +Boileau was born in the ''rue de Jérusalem'', in [[Paris, France]]. He was brought up to the law, but devoted to letters, associating himself with [[La Fontaine]], [[Jean Racine|Racine]], and [[Molière]]. He is the author of ''Satires'' and ''Epistles'', ''[[L'Art poétique (Boileau)|L'Art poétique]]'' and ''[[Le Lutrin]]'', in which he attacked and employed his wit against what he perceived to be the [[bad taste]] of his time.
-"Learned [[Classical antiquity|Antiquity]], through all its extent, Was never [[Age of Enlightenment|enlightened]] to equal our times." [[Bernard le Bovier de Fontenelle|Fontenelle]] quickly followed with his ''Digression sur les anciens et les modernes'' ([[1688]]), in which he took the Modern side, pressing the argument that modern scholarship allowed modern man to surpass the ancients in knowledge. +Boileau did much to reform the prevailing form of French poetry, as [[Blaise Pascal]] did to reform the prose, and was for long the law-giver of [[Parnassus]]. He was greatly influenced by [[Horace]].
-In the opening years of the next century [[Marivaux]] was to show himself truly a Modern in establishing quite a new genre of theatre, unknown to the Ancients, of sentimental comedy (''[[comédie larmoyante]]'') in which the impending tragedy was resolved at the end, amid reconciliations and floods of tears.+The surname "[[Despréaux]]" was derived from a small property at [[Crosne]] near [[Villeneuve-Saint-Georges]]. He was the fifteenth child of Gilles Boileau, a clerk in the ''parlement''. Two of his brothers attained some distinction: [[Gilles Boileau]], the author of a translation of [[Epictetus]]; and [[Jacques Boileau]], who became a canon of the [[Sainte-Chapelle]], and made valuable contributions to church history. His mother died when he was two years old; and Nicolas Boileau, who had a delicate constitution, seems to have suffered something from want of care.
- +
-The Quarrel of the Ancients and Moderns was a cover, often a witty one, for deeper opposed views. The very idea of Progress was under attack on the one side, and [[Authority]] on the other. The new [[Antiquary|antiquarian interests]] led to critical reassessment of the products of Antiquity that would eventually bring Scripture itself under the magnifying glass of some Moderns. The attack on authority in literary criticism had analogues in the rise of scientific inquiry, and the Moderns' challenge to authority in literature foreshadowed and later extension of challenging inquiry in systems of politics as well as religion.+
-In contemporary Britain, the quarrel was taken less seriously. [[William Temple (British politician)|Sir William Temple]] argued against the Modern position in his essay "On Ancient and Modern Learning" (where he incidentally repeated the commonplace, originally from [[Bernard of Chartres]], that we see more only because we are dwarves standing on the shoulders of giants). Temple's essay prompted a small flurry of responses. Among others, two men who took the side opposing Temple were [[Richard Bentley]] (classicist and editor) and [[William Wotton]] (critic).+[[Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve|Sainte-Beuve]] puts down his somewhat hard and unsympathetic outlook quite as much to the uninspiring circumstances of these days as to the general character of his time. He cannot be said to have been early disenchanted, for he never seems to have had any illusions; he grew up with a single passion, "the hatred of stupid books." He was educated at the Collège de Beauvais, and was then sent to study [[theology]] at the [[Collège de Sorbonne|Sorbonne]]. He exchanged theology for [[law]], however, and was called to the bar on [[December 4]], [[1656]]. From the profession of law, after a short trial, he recoiled in disgust, complaining bitterly of the amount of chicanery which passed under the name of law and justice. His father died in 1657, leaving him a small fortune, and thenceforward he devoted himself to letters.
-The entire discussion in England was over by 1696, and yet it seems to have fired [[Jonathan Swift]]'s imagination. Swift saw in the opposing camps of Ancients and Moderns a shorthand of two general ways of looking at the world, that he developed in his [[satire]] ''[[A Tale of a Tub]]'', composed between 1694 and 1697 and published in 1704 with the famous prolegomena ''[[The Battle of the Books]]'', long after the initial salvos were over in France. Swift's controversial and polarizing satire provided a framework for other satirists in his circle of the [[Scriblerus Club|Scriblerian]]s, and the Moderns against the Ancients is employed as one distinction between political and cultural forces.+===1660s===
 +Such of his early poems as have been preserved hardly contain the promise of what he ultimately became. The first piece in which his peculiar powers were displayed was the first satire (1660), in imitation of the [[Satires of Juvenal#Satire III|third satire]] of [[Juvenal]]; it embodied the farewell of a poet to the city of Paris. This was quickly followed by eight others, and the number was at a later period increased to twelve. A twofold interest attaches to the satires. In the first place the author skilfully parodies and attacks writers who at the time were placed in the very first rank, such as [[Jean Chapelain]], the abbé [[Charles Cotin]], [[Philippe Quinault]] and [[Georges de Scudéry]]; he openly raised the standard of revolt against the older poets. But in the second place he showed both by precept and practice what were the poetical capabilities of the French language. Prose in the hands of such writers as [[René Descartes|Descartes]] and [[Blaise Pascal|Pascal]] had proved itself a flexible and powerful instrument of expression, with a distinct mechanism and form. But except with [[Francois de Malherbe|Malherbe]], there had been no attempt to fashion French versification according to rule or method. In Boileau for the first time appeared terseness and vigour of expression, with perfect regularity of verse structure.
-==References==+His admiration for [[Molière]] found expression in the stanzas addressed to him (1663) and in the second satire (1664). In 1664 he composed his prose ''[[Dialogue sur les héros de roman]]'', a satire on the elaborate romances of the time, which may be said to have once for all abolished the lucubrations of La Calprenède, Mlle de Scudéry and their fellows. Though fairly widely read in manuscript, the book was not published till 1713, out of regard, it is said, for Mlle de Scudéry. To these early days belong the reunions at the Monton Blanc and the Pomme du Pin, where Boileau, Molière, [[Jean Racine|Racine]], [[Chapelle]] and [[Antoine Furetière]] met to discuss literary questions. To Molière and Racine he proved a constant friend, and supported their interests on many occasions.
-* [[Joan DeJean]], ''Ancients against Moderns: Culture Wars and the Making of a Fin de Siecle'', Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1997.+In 1666, prompted by the publication of two unauthorized editions, he published ''Satires du Sieur D....'', containing seven satires and the Discours au roi. From 1669 onwards appeared his ''epistles'', graver in tone than the satires, maturer in thought, more exquisite and polished in style. The ''Épîtres'' gained for him the favour of [[Louis XIV of France|Louis XIV]], who desired his presence at court. The king asked him which he thought his best verses. Whereupon Boileau diplomatically selected as his "least bad" some still unprinted lines in honour of the grand monarch and proceeded to recite them. He received forthwith a pension of 2000 livres.
-* [[Levent Yılmaz]], ''Le temps moderne : Variations sur les Anciens et les contemporains'', Paris: Editions Gallimard, 2004.+===1670s===
 +In 1674 his two masterpieces, ''L'Art poétique'' and ''Le Lutrin'', were published with some earlier works as the ''L'Œuvres diverses du sieur D...''. The first, in imitation of the ''Ars Poetica'' of [[Horace]], lays down the code for all future French verse, and may be said to fill in French literature a parallel place to that held by its prototype in Latin. On English literature the maxims of Boileau, through the translation revised by Dryden, and through the magnificent imitation of them in [[Alexander Pope|Pope]]'s ''Essay on Criticism'', have exercised no slight influence. Boileau does not merely lay down rules for the language of poetry, but analyses carefully the various kinds of verse composition, and enunciates the principles peculiar to each.
 + 
 +Of the four books of ''L'Art poétique'', the first and last consist of general precepts, inculcating mainly the great rule of ''bon sens''; the second treats of the pastoral, the elegy, the ode, the epigram and satire; and the third of tragic and epic poetry. Though the rules laid down are of value, their tendency is rather to hamper and render too mechanical the efforts of poetry. Boileau himself, a great, though, by no means infallible critic in verse, cannot be considered a great poet. He rendered the utmost service in destroying the exaggerated reputations of the mediocrities of his time, but his judgment was sometimes at fault. The ''Lutrin'', a mock heroic poem, of which four cantos appeared in 1674, furnished Alexander Pope with a model for the Rape of the Lock, but the English poem is superior in richness of imagination and subtlety of invention. The fifth and sixth cantos, afterwards added by Boileau, rather detract from the beauty of the poem; the last canto in particular is quite unworthy of his genius.
 + 
 +In 1674 appeared also his translation of [[Longinus (literature)|Longinus]]'s ''[[On the Sublime]]'', to which were added in 1693 certain critical reflections, chiefly directed against the theory of the [[Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns|superiority of the moderns over the ancients]] as advanced by [[Charles Perrault]].
 + 
 +Boileau was made historiographer to the king in 1677. From this time the amount of his production diminished. To this period of his life belong the satire, ''Sur les femmes'', the ode, ''Sur la prise de Namur'', the epistles, ''A mes vers'' and ''Sur l'amour de Dieu'', and the satire ''Sur l'homme''. The satires had raised up a crowd of enemies against Boileau. The 10th satire, on women, provoked an ''Apologie des femmes'' from Charles Perrault. Antoine Arnauld in the year of his death wrote a letter in defence of Boileau, but when at the desire of his friends he submitted his reply to Bossuet, the bishop pronounced all satire to be incompatible with the spirit of Christianity, and the 10th satire to be subversive of morality. The friends of [[Antoine Arnauld|Arnauld]] had declared that it was inconsistent with the dignity of a churchman to write on any subject so trivial as poetry. The epistle, ''Sur l'amour de Dieu'', was a triumphant vindication on the part of Boileau of the dignity of his art. It was not until [[April 15]] [[1684]] that he was admitted to the [[Académie française]], and then only by the king's wish. In 1687 he retired to a country-house he had bought at [[Auteuil]], which [[Jean Racine|Racine]], because of the numerous guests, calls his ''hôtellerie d'Auteuil''.
 + 
 +===1700-===
 +In 1705 he sold his house and returned to Paris, where he lived with his confessor in the [[cloister]]s of [[Notre Dame de Paris|Notre Dame]]. In the 12th satire, ''Sur l'équivoque'', he attacked the [[Jesuits]] in verses which Sainte-Beuve called a recapitulation of the ''Lettres provinciales'' of Pascal. This was written about 1705. He then gave his attention to the arrangement of a complete and definitive edition of his works. But the Jesuit fathers obtained from Louis XIV the withdrawal of the privilege already granted for the publication, and demanded the suppression of the 12th satire. These annoyances are said to have hastened his death, which took place on the 13th of March 1711.
 + 
 +Boileau was a man of warm and kindly feelings, honest, outspoken and benevolent. Many anecdotes are told of his frankness of speech at court, and of his generous actions. He holds a well-defined place in French literature, as the first who reduced its versification to rule, and taught the value of workmanship for its own sake. His influence on English literature, through Pope and his contemporaries, was not less strong, though less durable. After much undue depreciation Boileau's critical work has been rehabilitated by recent writers, perhaps to the extent of some exaggeration in the other direction. It has been shown that in spite of undue harshness in individual cases most of his criticisms have been substantially adopted by his successors.
 + 
 +Numerous editions of Boileau's works were published during his lifetime. The last of these, ''l'Œuvres diverses'' (1701), known as the "favourite" edition of the poet, was reprinted with variants and notes by Alphonse Pauly (2 vols., 1894). The critical text of his works was established by Berriat Saint-Prix, ''Œuvres de Boileau'' (4 vols., 1830&mdash;1837), who made use of some 350 editions. This text, edited with notes by [[Paul Chéron]], with the ''Boloeana'' of 1740, and an essay by [[Sainte-Beuve]], was reprinted by Garnier frères (1860).
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Current revision

"No monster exists that cannot be made pleasing through art"

"Rien n'est beau que le vrai; le vrai seul est aimable"

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux (1 November 1636 – 13 March 1711) was a French poet and critic.

Boileau did much to reform the prevailing form of French poetry, as Blaise Pascal did to reform the prose. He was greatly influenced by Horace. He is best-known for his Traité du sublime. Réflexions critiques sur Longin, L'Art poétique and a number of dicta.

Contents

Overview

The surname "Despréaux" was derived from a small property at Crosne near Villeneuve-Saint-Georges. He was the fifteenth child of Gilles Boileau, a clerk in the parlement. Two of his brothers attained some distinction: Gilles Boileau, the author of a translation of Epictetus; and Jacques Boileau, who became a canon of the Sainte-Chapelle, and made valuable contributions to church history. His mother died when he was two years old; and Nicolas Boileau, who had a delicate constitution, seems to have suffered something from want of care.

Sainte-Beuve puts down his somewhat hard and unsympathetic outlook quite as much to the uninspiring circumstances of these days as to the general character of his time. He cannot be said to have been early disenchanted, for he never seems to have had any illusions; he grew up with a single passion, "the hatred of stupid books." He was educated at the Collège de Beauvais, and was then sent to study theology at the Sorbonne. He exchanged theology for law, however, and was called to the bar on December 4, 1656. From the profession of law, after a short trial, he recoiled in disgust, complaining bitterly of the amount of chicanery which passed under the name of law and justice. His father died in 1657, leaving him a small fortune, and thenceforward he devoted himself to letters.

Biography

Boileau was born in the rue de Jérusalem, in Paris, France. He was brought up to the law, but devoted to letters, associating himself with La Fontaine, Racine, and Molière. He is the author of Satires and Epistles, L'Art poétique and Le Lutrin, in which he attacked and employed his wit against what he perceived to be the bad taste of his time.

Boileau did much to reform the prevailing form of French poetry, as Blaise Pascal did to reform the prose, and was for long the law-giver of Parnassus. He was greatly influenced by Horace.

The surname "Despréaux" was derived from a small property at Crosne near Villeneuve-Saint-Georges. He was the fifteenth child of Gilles Boileau, a clerk in the parlement. Two of his brothers attained some distinction: Gilles Boileau, the author of a translation of Epictetus; and Jacques Boileau, who became a canon of the Sainte-Chapelle, and made valuable contributions to church history. His mother died when he was two years old; and Nicolas Boileau, who had a delicate constitution, seems to have suffered something from want of care.

Sainte-Beuve puts down his somewhat hard and unsympathetic outlook quite as much to the uninspiring circumstances of these days as to the general character of his time. He cannot be said to have been early disenchanted, for he never seems to have had any illusions; he grew up with a single passion, "the hatred of stupid books." He was educated at the Collège de Beauvais, and was then sent to study theology at the Sorbonne. He exchanged theology for law, however, and was called to the bar on December 4, 1656. From the profession of law, after a short trial, he recoiled in disgust, complaining bitterly of the amount of chicanery which passed under the name of law and justice. His father died in 1657, leaving him a small fortune, and thenceforward he devoted himself to letters.

1660s

Such of his early poems as have been preserved hardly contain the promise of what he ultimately became. The first piece in which his peculiar powers were displayed was the first satire (1660), in imitation of the third satire of Juvenal; it embodied the farewell of a poet to the city of Paris. This was quickly followed by eight others, and the number was at a later period increased to twelve. A twofold interest attaches to the satires. In the first place the author skilfully parodies and attacks writers who at the time were placed in the very first rank, such as Jean Chapelain, the abbé Charles Cotin, Philippe Quinault and Georges de Scudéry; he openly raised the standard of revolt against the older poets. But in the second place he showed both by precept and practice what were the poetical capabilities of the French language. Prose in the hands of such writers as Descartes and Pascal had proved itself a flexible and powerful instrument of expression, with a distinct mechanism and form. But except with Malherbe, there had been no attempt to fashion French versification according to rule or method. In Boileau for the first time appeared terseness and vigour of expression, with perfect regularity of verse structure.

His admiration for Molière found expression in the stanzas addressed to him (1663) and in the second satire (1664). In 1664 he composed his prose Dialogue sur les héros de roman, a satire on the elaborate romances of the time, which may be said to have once for all abolished the lucubrations of La Calprenède, Mlle de Scudéry and their fellows. Though fairly widely read in manuscript, the book was not published till 1713, out of regard, it is said, for Mlle de Scudéry. To these early days belong the reunions at the Monton Blanc and the Pomme du Pin, where Boileau, Molière, Racine, Chapelle and Antoine Furetière met to discuss literary questions. To Molière and Racine he proved a constant friend, and supported their interests on many occasions.

In 1666, prompted by the publication of two unauthorized editions, he published Satires du Sieur D...., containing seven satires and the Discours au roi. From 1669 onwards appeared his epistles, graver in tone than the satires, maturer in thought, more exquisite and polished in style. The Épîtres gained for him the favour of Louis XIV, who desired his presence at court. The king asked him which he thought his best verses. Whereupon Boileau diplomatically selected as his "least bad" some still unprinted lines in honour of the grand monarch and proceeded to recite them. He received forthwith a pension of 2000 livres.

1670s

In 1674 his two masterpieces, L'Art poétique and Le Lutrin, were published with some earlier works as the L'Œuvres diverses du sieur D.... The first, in imitation of the Ars Poetica of Horace, lays down the code for all future French verse, and may be said to fill in French literature a parallel place to that held by its prototype in Latin. On English literature the maxims of Boileau, through the translation revised by Dryden, and through the magnificent imitation of them in Pope's Essay on Criticism, have exercised no slight influence. Boileau does not merely lay down rules for the language of poetry, but analyses carefully the various kinds of verse composition, and enunciates the principles peculiar to each.

Of the four books of L'Art poétique, the first and last consist of general precepts, inculcating mainly the great rule of bon sens; the second treats of the pastoral, the elegy, the ode, the epigram and satire; and the third of tragic and epic poetry. Though the rules laid down are of value, their tendency is rather to hamper and render too mechanical the efforts of poetry. Boileau himself, a great, though, by no means infallible critic in verse, cannot be considered a great poet. He rendered the utmost service in destroying the exaggerated reputations of the mediocrities of his time, but his judgment was sometimes at fault. The Lutrin, a mock heroic poem, of which four cantos appeared in 1674, furnished Alexander Pope with a model for the Rape of the Lock, but the English poem is superior in richness of imagination and subtlety of invention. The fifth and sixth cantos, afterwards added by Boileau, rather detract from the beauty of the poem; the last canto in particular is quite unworthy of his genius.

In 1674 appeared also his translation of Longinus's On the Sublime, to which were added in 1693 certain critical reflections, chiefly directed against the theory of the superiority of the moderns over the ancients as advanced by Charles Perrault.

Boileau was made historiographer to the king in 1677. From this time the amount of his production diminished. To this period of his life belong the satire, Sur les femmes, the ode, Sur la prise de Namur, the epistles, A mes vers and Sur l'amour de Dieu, and the satire Sur l'homme. The satires had raised up a crowd of enemies against Boileau. The 10th satire, on women, provoked an Apologie des femmes from Charles Perrault. Antoine Arnauld in the year of his death wrote a letter in defence of Boileau, but when at the desire of his friends he submitted his reply to Bossuet, the bishop pronounced all satire to be incompatible with the spirit of Christianity, and the 10th satire to be subversive of morality. The friends of Arnauld had declared that it was inconsistent with the dignity of a churchman to write on any subject so trivial as poetry. The epistle, Sur l'amour de Dieu, was a triumphant vindication on the part of Boileau of the dignity of his art. It was not until April 15 1684 that he was admitted to the Académie française, and then only by the king's wish. In 1687 he retired to a country-house he had bought at Auteuil, which Racine, because of the numerous guests, calls his hôtellerie d'Auteuil.

1700-

In 1705 he sold his house and returned to Paris, where he lived with his confessor in the cloisters of Notre Dame. In the 12th satire, Sur l'équivoque, he attacked the Jesuits in verses which Sainte-Beuve called a recapitulation of the Lettres provinciales of Pascal. This was written about 1705. He then gave his attention to the arrangement of a complete and definitive edition of his works. But the Jesuit fathers obtained from Louis XIV the withdrawal of the privilege already granted for the publication, and demanded the suppression of the 12th satire. These annoyances are said to have hastened his death, which took place on the 13th of March 1711.

Boileau was a man of warm and kindly feelings, honest, outspoken and benevolent. Many anecdotes are told of his frankness of speech at court, and of his generous actions. He holds a well-defined place in French literature, as the first who reduced its versification to rule, and taught the value of workmanship for its own sake. His influence on English literature, through Pope and his contemporaries, was not less strong, though less durable. After much undue depreciation Boileau's critical work has been rehabilitated by recent writers, perhaps to the extent of some exaggeration in the other direction. It has been shown that in spite of undue harshness in individual cases most of his criticisms have been substantially adopted by his successors.

Numerous editions of Boileau's works were published during his lifetime. The last of these, l'Œuvres diverses (1701), known as the "favourite" edition of the poet, was reprinted with variants and notes by Alphonse Pauly (2 vols., 1894). The critical text of his works was established by Berriat Saint-Prix, Œuvres de Boileau (4 vols., 1830—1837), who made use of some 350 editions. This text, edited with notes by Paul Chéron, with the Boloeana of 1740, and an essay by Sainte-Beuve, was reprinted by Garnier frères (1860).




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools