Olympia (Manet)
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
| Revision as of 22:52, 21 May 2007 WikiSysop (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 22:53, 21 May 2007 WikiSysop (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
| - | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/{{PAGENAMEE}}] [May 2007] | + | '''''Olympia''''' is an oil on canvas painting by [[Édouard Manet]] in the [[Realism (visual arts)|Realism]] style. Painted in [[1863 in art|1863]], it measures 130.5 by 190 centimetres (51 x 74.8 [[Inch|in]]). The nation of France acquired the painting in [[1890]] with a public subscription organised by [[Claude Monet]]. It is now in the [[Musée d'Orsay]], [[Paris]]. |
| + | |||
| + | ==Critical reaction== | ||
| + | Though Manet's ''[[Le déjeuner sur l'herbe|The Luncheon on the Grass (Le déjeuner sur l'herbe)]]'' sparked controversy in [[1863]], his ''Olympia'' stirred an even bigger uproar when it was first exhibited at the [[1865]] [[Paris Salon]]. Conservatives condemned the work as "immoral" and "vulgar." Journalist [[Antonin Proust]] later recalled, | ||
| + | |||
| + | :''If the canvas of the Olympia was not destroyed, it is only because of the precautions that were taken by the administration.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, the work had proponents as well. [[Emile Zola]] quickly proclaimed it Manet's "masterpiece" and added, | ||
| + | |||
| + | :''When other artists correct nature by painting Venus they lie. Manet asked himself why he should lie. Why not tell the truth?'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Precedents== | ||
| + | The painting was inspired by [[Titian]]'s ''[[Venus of Urbino]]'', which in turn refers to [[Giorgione]]'s ''[[Sleeping Venus]]''[http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/html/g/giorgion/venus.html]. There were pictorial precedents for a nude woman, attended by a (black) servant, such as [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres|Ingres]]' ''Odalisque with a Slave'' ([[1842]]), [[Léon Benouville]]'s ''Esther with Odalisque'' ([[1844]]) and [[Charles Jalabert]]'s ''Odalisque'' ([[1842]]).[http://19thc-artworldwide.org/spring_04/articles/floy_print.html] Comparison is also made to Ingres' ''La grande Odalisque'' ([[1814]]). But Manet did not depict a goddess or an [[odalisque]], but a high-class [[prostitution|prostitute]] waiting for a client. The classic work that most closely resembles Manet's in character is [[Francisco Goya]]'s ''[[La maja desnuda]]'' (c. 1800). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Content== | ||
| + | What shocked contemporary audiences was not Olympia's nudity, nor even the presence of her fully clothed maid, but her confrontational gaze and a number of details identifying her as a ''[[Demimondaine|demi-mondaine]]'' or courtesan, such as the orchid in her hair, her bracelet, pearl earrings and the oriental shawl on which she lies, symbols of wealth and sensuality. The black ribbon around her neck, in stark contrast with her pale flesh, and her cast-off slipper underline the voluptuous atmosphere. Whereas Titian's Venus delicately covers her sex, Olympia's hand firmly protects hers, as if to emphasize her independence and sexual dominance over men. Manet replaced the little dog (symbol of fidelity) in Titian's painting with a black cat, which symbolized prostitution. Olympia disdainfully ignores the flowers presented to her by her servant, probably a gift from a client. Some have suggested that she is looking in the direction of the door, as her client barges in unannounced. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The painting deviates from the academic canon in its style, characterized by broad, quick brushstrokes, studio lighting that eliminates mid-tones, large color surfaces and shallow depth. Instead of a smooth idealised nude, as in [[Alexandre Cabanel]]'s [[:Image:Alexandre Cabanel The Birth of Venus.jpg|''La naissance de Vénus'']] (also painted in [[1863]]), Manet painted a ''real'' woman, whose nakedness is revealed in all its brutality by the harsh light. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The model, [[Victorine Meurent]], went on to become an accomplished painter in her own right. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References== | ||
| + | *Ross King. ''The Judgment of Paris: The Revolutionary Decade that Gave the World Impressionism''. New York: Waller & Company, 2006 ISBN 0-8027-1466-8. See pages 105-108. | ||
| + | *Eunice Lipton. ''Alias Olympia: A Woman's Search for Manet's Notorious Model & Her Own Desire''. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/{{PAGENAMEE}}] [May 2007] | ||
Revision as of 22:53, 21 May 2007
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
Olympia is an oil on canvas painting by Édouard Manet in the Realism style. Painted in 1863, it measures 130.5 by 190 centimetres (51 x 74.8 in). The nation of France acquired the painting in 1890 with a public subscription organised by Claude Monet. It is now in the Musée d'Orsay, Paris.
Contents |
Critical reaction
Though Manet's The Luncheon on the Grass (Le déjeuner sur l'herbe) sparked controversy in 1863, his Olympia stirred an even bigger uproar when it was first exhibited at the 1865 Paris Salon. Conservatives condemned the work as "immoral" and "vulgar." Journalist Antonin Proust later recalled,
- If the canvas of the Olympia was not destroyed, it is only because of the precautions that were taken by the administration.
However, the work had proponents as well. Emile Zola quickly proclaimed it Manet's "masterpiece" and added,
- When other artists correct nature by painting Venus they lie. Manet asked himself why he should lie. Why not tell the truth?
Precedents
The painting was inspired by Titian's Venus of Urbino, which in turn refers to Giorgione's Sleeping Venus[1]. There were pictorial precedents for a nude woman, attended by a (black) servant, such as Ingres' Odalisque with a Slave (1842), Léon Benouville's Esther with Odalisque (1844) and Charles Jalabert's Odalisque (1842).[2] Comparison is also made to Ingres' La grande Odalisque (1814). But Manet did not depict a goddess or an odalisque, but a high-class prostitute waiting for a client. The classic work that most closely resembles Manet's in character is Francisco Goya's La maja desnuda (c. 1800).
Content
What shocked contemporary audiences was not Olympia's nudity, nor even the presence of her fully clothed maid, but her confrontational gaze and a number of details identifying her as a demi-mondaine or courtesan, such as the orchid in her hair, her bracelet, pearl earrings and the oriental shawl on which she lies, symbols of wealth and sensuality. The black ribbon around her neck, in stark contrast with her pale flesh, and her cast-off slipper underline the voluptuous atmosphere. Whereas Titian's Venus delicately covers her sex, Olympia's hand firmly protects hers, as if to emphasize her independence and sexual dominance over men. Manet replaced the little dog (symbol of fidelity) in Titian's painting with a black cat, which symbolized prostitution. Olympia disdainfully ignores the flowers presented to her by her servant, probably a gift from a client. Some have suggested that she is looking in the direction of the door, as her client barges in unannounced.
The painting deviates from the academic canon in its style, characterized by broad, quick brushstrokes, studio lighting that eliminates mid-tones, large color surfaces and shallow depth. Instead of a smooth idealised nude, as in Alexandre Cabanel's La naissance de Vénus (also painted in 1863), Manet painted a real woman, whose nakedness is revealed in all its brutality by the harsh light.
The model, Victorine Meurent, went on to become an accomplished painter in her own right.
References
- Ross King. The Judgment of Paris: The Revolutionary Decade that Gave the World Impressionism. New York: Waller & Company, 2006 ISBN 0-8027-1466-8. See pages 105-108.
- Eunice Lipton. Alias Olympia: A Woman's Search for Manet's Notorious Model & Her Own Desire. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.[3] [May 2007]
