Pernicious Literature
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 00:29, 4 January 2012 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) (Pernicious Literature moved to Pernicious literature: debate in the House of Commons : trial and conviction for sale of Zola's novels. With opinions of the press) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 00:37, 4 January 2012 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
| - | :"[[Zolaism]] is a disease. It is a study of the putrid. . . . No one can read Zola without moral contamination. ... The [[National Vigilance Association]], "[[Pernicious Literature]]" (1889), [[The Methodist Times]]'s response to the [[Vizetelly trial]] | + | :"[[Zolaism]] is a disease. It is a study of the [[putrid]]. . . . No one can read Zola without moral [[contamination]]. ... The [[National Vigilance Association]], "[[Pernicious Literature]]" (1889) cites [[The Methodist Times]]'s response to the [[Vizetelly trial]] |
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| *[[Pernicious]] | *[[Pernicious]] | ||
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Revision as of 00:37, 4 January 2012
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
- "Zolaism is a disease. It is a study of the putrid. . . . No one can read Zola without moral contamination. ... The National Vigilance Association, "Pernicious Literature" (1889) cites The Methodist Times's response to the Vizetelly trial
See also
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Pernicious Literature" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.
