Pernicious Literature  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 13:44, 5 March 2018
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 13:49, 5 March 2018
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 4: Line 4:
by the [[National Vigilance Association]] on the [[Vizetelly trial]]. by the [[National Vigilance Association]] on the [[Vizetelly trial]].
-It consisted of MP [[Samuel Smith (1836–1906)|Samuel Smith]]'s [[House of Commons]] [[RESOLUTION. HC Deb 08 May 1888 vol 325 cc1707-25 1707|motion]] with an appeal for 'a healthy public opinion' necessary 'to enable this Association to set the law in motion'.+It consisted of MP [[Samuel Smith (1836–1906)|Samuel Smith]]'s [[House of Commons]] [[motion]] ([[RESOLUTION. HC Deb 08 May 1888 vol 325 cc1707-25 1707 ]]) with an appeal for 'a healthy public opinion' necessary 'to enable this Association to set the law in motion'.
:"We have never been able to believe in the moral intentions of Zola, and it has always been a marvel to us that such a critic as Mr. James should seriously contend for them. [[Zolaism]] is a disease. It is a study of the [[putrid]]. . . . No one can read Zola without moral [[contamination]]." -- The [[National Vigilance Association]], "[[Pernicious Literature]]" (1889) citing [[The Methodist Times]]'s response to the [[Vizetelly trial]] :"We have never been able to believe in the moral intentions of Zola, and it has always been a marvel to us that such a critic as Mr. James should seriously contend for them. [[Zolaism]] is a disease. It is a study of the [[putrid]]. . . . No one can read Zola without moral [[contamination]]." -- The [[National Vigilance Association]], "[[Pernicious Literature]]" (1889) citing [[The Methodist Times]]'s response to the [[Vizetelly trial]]

Revision as of 13:49, 5 March 2018

Frontispiece of "Pernicious Literature" (1889)
Enlarge
Frontispiece of "Pernicious Literature" (1889)

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

"Pernicious literature: debate in the House of Commons : trial and conviction for sale of Zola's novels. With opinions of the press" (1889) is a pamphlet by the National Vigilance Association on the Vizetelly trial.

It consisted of MP Samuel Smith's House of Commons motion (RESOLUTION. HC Deb 08 May 1888 vol 325 cc1707-25 1707 ) with an appeal for 'a healthy public opinion' necessary 'to enable this Association to set the law in motion'.

"We have never been able to believe in the moral intentions of Zola, and it has always been a marvel to us that such a critic as Mr. James should seriously contend for them. Zolaism is a disease. It is a study of the putrid. . . . No one can read Zola without moral contamination." -- The National Vigilance Association, "Pernicious Literature" (1889) citing The Methodist Times's response to the Vizetelly trial

Incipit

"THE NATIONAL VIGILANCE Association earnestly invite your serious perusal of the following pamphlet, referring to the widespread circulation of pernicious literature among the young people of our nation. The peculiar and special nature of the work done by this Association affords exceptional opportunities of ascertaining the enormous amount of evil which is wrought by the circulation of immoral literature and obscene pictures, and the matter is one of such urgent and vital ..."

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Pernicious Literature" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools