Rationality  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 20:53, 29 May 2011
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 10:03, 3 March 2014
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[Image:The Heart Has Its Reasons by Odilon Redon.jpg |thumb|right|200px|''[[The heart has its reasons, of which reason knows nothing]]'' (c. 1887) by [[Odilon Redon]], a [[dictum]] from the ''[[Pensées]]'' (1669) by [[Blaise Pascal]]]]
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-'''Rationality''' is the exercise of logic in [[philosophy]]. It is the manner people derive conclusions when considering things deliberately. It also refers to the conformity of one's beliefs with one's [[reason (argument)|reasons]] for belief, or with one's actions with one's [[reason (argument)|reasons]] for action. However, the term "rationality" tends to be used in the specialized discussions of [[economics]], [[sociology]], [[psychology]] and [[political science]]. Rationality deals with the ratio of benefits to costs. A '''rational''' decision is one that is not just reasoned, but is also optimal for achieving a goal or solving a problem. The term "'''rationality'''" is used differently in different disciplines.<br />+'''Rationality''' is the exercise of [[logic]] in [[philosophy]]. It is the manner people derive conclusions when considering things deliberately. It also refers to the conformity of one's beliefs with one's [[reason (argument)|reasons]] for belief, or with one's actions with one's [[reason (argument)|reasons]] for action. However, the term "rationality" tends to be used in the specialized discussions of [[economics]], [[sociology]], [[psychology]] and [[political science]]. Rationality deals with the ratio of benefits to costs. A '''rational''' decision is one that is not just reasoned, but is also optimal for achieving a goal or solving a problem. The term "'''rationality'''" is used differently in different disciplines.<br />
- +
-Determining optimality for rational behavior requires a quantifiable formulation of the problem, and the making of several key assumptions. When the goal or problem involves making a decision, rationality factors in how much information is available (e.g. complete or incomplete [[knowledge]]). Collectively, the formulation and background assumptions are the model within which rationality applies. Illustrating the relativity of rationality: if one accepts a model in which benefiting oneself is optimal, then rationality is equated with behavior that is self-interested to the point of being selfish; whereas if one accepts a model in which benefiting the group is optimal, then purely selfish behavior is deemed irrational. It is thus meaningless to assert rationality without also specifying the background model assumptions describing how the problem is framed and formulated.+
- +
-==Theories of rationality==+
- +
-The German sociologist [[Max Weber]] proposed an interpretation of social action that distinguished between four different types of rationality. The first, which he called ''Zweckrational'' or purposive/instrumental rationality, is related to the expectations about the behavior of other human beings or objects in the environment. These expectations serve as means for a particular actor to attain ends, ends which Weber noted were "rationally pursued and calculated." The second type, Weber called ''Wertrational'' or value/belief-oriented. Here the action is undertaken for what one might call reasons intrinsic to the actor: some ethical, aesthetic, religious or other motive, independent of whether it will lead to success. The third type was affectual, determined by an actor's specific affect, feeling, or emotion – to which Weber himself said that this was a kind of rationality that was on the borderline of what he considered "meaningfully oriented." The fourth was traditional, determined by ingrained habituation. Weber emphasized that it was very unusual to find only one of these orientations: combinations were the norm. His usage also makes clear that he considered the first two as more significant than the others, and it is arguable that the third and fourth are subtypes of the first two. These kinds of '''rationality''' were '''ideal types'''.+
- +
-The advantage in this interpretation is that it avoids a value-laden assessment, say, that certain kinds of beliefs are irrational. Instead, Weber suggests that a ground or motive can be given – for religious or affect reasons, for example — that may meet the criterion of explanation or justification even if it is not an explanation that fits the ''Zweckrational'' orientation of means and ends. The opposite is therefore also true: some means-ends explanations will not satisfy those whose grounds for action are ''''Wertrational''''.+
- +
-Weber's constructions of rationality have been critiqued both from a [[Jürgen Habermas|Habermasian]] (1984) perspective (as devoid of social context and under-theorised in terms of social power) and also from a [[feminist]] perspective (Eagleton, 2003) whereby Weber's rationality constructs are viewed as imbued with masculine values and oriented toward the maintenance of male power. An alternative position on rationality (which includes both bounded rationality (Simons and Hawkins, 1949), as well as the affective and value-based arguments of Weber) can be found in the critique of Etzioni (1988), who reframes thought on decision-making to argue for a reversal of the position put forward by Weber. Etzioni illustrates how purposive/instrumental reasoning is subordinated by normative considerations (ideas on how people 'ought' to behave) and affective considerations (as a support system for the development of human relationships).+
- +
-In the [[psychology of reasoning]], psychologists and cognitive scientists have defended different positions on human rationality. One prominent view, due to [[Philip Johnson-Laird]] and [[Ruth M.J. Byrne]] among others is that humans are rational in principle but they err in practice, that is, humans have the competence to be rational but their performance is limited by various factors +
- +
-==Quality of rationality==+
- +
-It is believed by some philosophers (notably [[A.C. Grayling]]) that a good rationale must be independent of emotions, personal feelings or any kind of instincts. Any process of evaluation or analysis, that may be called rational, is expected to be highly objective, logical and "mechanical". If these minimum requirements are not satisfied i.e. if a person has been, even slightly, influenced by personal emotions, feelings, instincts or culturally specific, moral codes and norms, then the analysis may be termed irrational, due to the injection of subjective bias.+
- +
-It is evident from modern cognitive science and neuroscience, studying the role of emotion in mental function (including topics ranging from flashes of scientific insight to making future plans), that no human has ever satisfied this criterion, except perhaps a person with no affective feelings, for example an individual with a massively damaged [[amygdala]] or severe psychopathy. Thus, such an idealized form of rationality is best exemplified by computers, and not people. However, scholars may productively appeal to the idealization as a point of reference.+
- +
-==Theoretical and practical rationality==+
- +
-[[Kant]] had distinguished theoretical from practical reason. Rationality theorist [[Jesús Mosterín]] makes a parallel distinction between theoretical and practical rationality, although, according to him, reason and rationality are not the same: reason would be a psychological faculty, whereas rationality is an optimizing strategy. Humans are not rational by definition, but they can think and behave rationally or not, depending on whether they apply, explicitly or implicitly, the strategy of theoretical and practical rationality to the thoughts they accept and to the actions they perform. Theoretical rationality has a formal component that reduces to logical consistency and a material component that reduces to empirical support, relying on our inborn mechanisms of signal detection and interpretation. Mosterín distinguishes between involuntary and implicit belief, on the one hand, and voluntary and explicit acceptance, on the other. Theoretical rationality can more properly be said to regulate our acceptances than our beliefs. Practical rationality is the strategy for living one’s best possible life, achieving your most important goals and your own preferences in as far as possible. Practical rationality has also a formal component, that reduces to [[Bayes estimator|Bayesian decision theory]], and a material component, rooted in human nature (lastly, in our genome).+
- +
-==Examples of Rationality Applied to Different Fields==+
- +
-Individuals or [[organization]]s are called rational if they make optimal decisions in pursuit of their goals. It is in these terms that one speaks, for example, of a rational allocation of resources, or of a rational corporate strategy. For such "rationality", the decision maker's goals are taken as part of the model, and not made subject to criticism, ethical or otherwise. +
- +
-Debates arise in these four fields about whether or not people or organizations are "really" rational, as well as whether it make sense to model them as such in formal models. Some have argued that a kind of [[bounded rationality]] makes more sense for such models.+
- +
-Others think that any kind of rationality along the lines of [[rational choice theory]] is a useless concept for understanding human behavior; the term ''[[homo economicus]]'' (economic man: the imaginary man being assumed in economic models who is [[logically consistent]] but amoral) was coined largely in honor of this view.+
- +
-===Artificial Intelligence===+
-Within [[artificial intelligence]], a ''[[intelligent agent|rational agent]]'' is one that maximizes its expected ''utility'', given its current knowledge. Utility is the usefulness of the consequences of its actions. The utility function is arbitrarily defined by the designer, but should be a function of ''performance'', which is the directly measurable consequences, such as winning or losing money. In order to make a safe agent that plays defensively, a nonlinear function of performance is often desired, so that the reward for winning is lower than the punishment for losing. An agent might be rational within its own problem area, but finding the rational decision for arbitrarily complex problems is not practically possible. The rationality of human thought is a key problem in the [[psychology of reasoning]].+
- +
-== Rationality and power ==+
-The relationship between rationality and political power was studied by [[Flyvbjerg]] (1998). He found that in real-life decision making rationality is context-dependent and the context of rationality is power. Thus power profoundly influences rationality, and what decision makers think of and present as rationality is often a rationalization of power positions, according to Flyvbjerg. In a paraphrase of Blaise Pascal, Flyvbjerg concludes that "power has a rationality that rationality does not know."+
- +
==See also== ==See also==
-<div style="-moz-column-count:3; column-count:3;"> 
* [[Bounded rationality]] * [[Bounded rationality]]
* [[Coherence (linguistics)|coherent]] * [[Coherence (linguistics)|coherent]]
Line 46: Line 9:
* [[Flipism]] * [[Flipism]]
* [[Homo economicus]] * [[Homo economicus]]
-* [[Imputation (game theory)|Individual rationality]] 
* [[Intelligence]] * [[Intelligence]]
* [[Irrationality]] * [[Irrationality]]
-* [[Laws of thought]]+* [[Ratio]]
-* [[Perfect rationality]]+* [[Rationale]]
-* [[Principle of rationality]]+
-* [[Rational choice theory]]+
-* [[Rational emotive behavior therapy]]+
-* [[Rational pricing]]+
-* [[Rationalism]]+
-* [[Rationality and power]]+
-* [[Rationalization (economics)|rationalize]]+
-* [[Satisficing]]+
-* [[Superrationality]]+
-</div>+
- +
- +
- +
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 10:03, 3 March 2014

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Rationality is the exercise of logic in philosophy. It is the manner people derive conclusions when considering things deliberately. It also refers to the conformity of one's beliefs with one's reasons for belief, or with one's actions with one's reasons for action. However, the term "rationality" tends to be used in the specialized discussions of economics, sociology, psychology and political science. Rationality deals with the ratio of benefits to costs. A rational decision is one that is not just reasoned, but is also optimal for achieving a goal or solving a problem. The term "rationality" is used differently in different disciplines.

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Rationality" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools