Sacred–profane dichotomy
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
Related e |
Featured: |
French sociologist Émile Durkheim considered the dichotomy between the sacred and the profane to be the central characteristic of religion:
In Durkheim's theory, the sacred represented the interests of the group, especially unity, which were embodied in sacred group symbols, or totems. The profane, on the other hand, involved mundane individual concerns. Durkheim explicitly stated that the dichotomy sacred/profane was not equivalent to good/evil. The sacred could be good or evil, and the profane could be either as well.
Criticism
Durkheim's claim of the universality of this dichotomy for all religions/cults has been criticized by scholars like British anthropologist Jack Goody. Goody also noted that "many societies have no words that translate as sacred or profane and that ultimately, just like the distinction between natural and supernatural, it was very much a product of European religious thought rather than a universally applicable criterion."
See also
- Carnival and Carnivalesque
- Grotesque body
- Mircea Eliade
- Profanum
- Ritual and Ceremony
- Sacred and Profane Love (Oil painting, by Titian)
- Social control
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Sacred–profane dichotomy" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.