The Culture of Craft  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 12:40, 16 April 2018
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5" {| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
| style="text-align: left;" | | style="text-align: left;" |
-"It also identified high art with non-[[function|functional]] objects. For [[Charles Robert Cockerell|Cockerell]], in order to be a truly [[Disinterestedness |disinterested]] vehicle of artistic ideas, a genre had to be severed from perceivable [[use-value]]. For this reason, he positions [[architecture]] alongside the [[decorative arts]]. For [[Richard Redgrave|Redgrave]], utility was irrelevant. The [[Authorial intent|intention]] behind the creation of the object was the key to its status as art. Using a position usually associated with [[John Ruskin]], he was arguing that an was a quality that could be applied to any ..." --''[[The Culture of Craft]]'', [[Peter Dormer]], 1997+"[[Charles Robert Cockerell|Cockerell]]'s division of the arts into poetry and prose revealed the continuing sense that poetry was one of the fine arts. It also identified [[high art]] with non-[[function|functional]] objects. For Cockerell, in order to be a truly [[Disinterestedness |disinterested]] vehicle of artistic ideas, a genre had to be severed from perceivable [[use-value]]. For this reason, he positions [[architecture]] alongside the [[decorative arts]]. For [[Richard Redgrave|Redgrave]], utility was irrelevant. The [[Authorial intent|intention]] behind the creation of the object was the key to its status as art. Using a position usually associated with [[John Ruskin]], he was arguing that an was a quality that could be applied to any ..." --''[[The Culture of Craft]]'', [[Peter Dormer]], 1997
|} |}
 +
{{Template}} {{Template}}
''[[The Culture of Craft]]'' (1997) is a book by [[Peter Dormer]]. ''[[The Culture of Craft]]'' (1997) is a book by [[Peter Dormer]].
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Current revision

"Cockerell's division of the arts into poetry and prose revealed the continuing sense that poetry was one of the fine arts. It also identified high art with non-functional objects. For Cockerell, in order to be a truly disinterested vehicle of artistic ideas, a genre had to be severed from perceivable use-value. For this reason, he positions architecture alongside the decorative arts. For Redgrave, utility was irrelevant. The intention behind the creation of the object was the key to its status as art. Using a position usually associated with John Ruskin, he was arguing that an was a quality that could be applied to any ..." --The Culture of Craft, Peter Dormer, 1997

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

The Culture of Craft (1997) is a book by Peter Dormer.



Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "The Culture of Craft" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools