The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 22:17, 17 February 2008
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)
(Problem of the corpus)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 22:19, 17 February 2008
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 3: Line 3:
Tzvetan Todorov holds that [[fantastic literature]] involves an [[unresolved]] [[hesitation]] between a supernatural (or otherwise paranormal or impossible) solution and a psychological (or realistic) one. His term ''hesitation'' is reminiscent of the terms ''[[ambiguity]]'' and ''[[ambivalence]]'' used in the definition of the [[grotesque]]. Tzvetan Todorov holds that [[fantastic literature]] involves an [[unresolved]] [[hesitation]] between a supernatural (or otherwise paranormal or impossible) solution and a psychological (or realistic) one. His term ''hesitation'' is reminiscent of the terms ''[[ambiguity]]'' and ''[[ambivalence]]'' used in the definition of the [[grotesque]].
 +
 +Todorov compares the fantastic with two other ideas: The [[Uncanny]], wherein the phenomenon turns out to have a rational explanation such as in the [[Gothic fiction|gothic]] works of [[Ann Radcliffe]]; or the [[Marvelous]], where there truly is a supernatural explanation for the phenomenon.
== Genre-theoretical aspects == == Genre-theoretical aspects ==

Revision as of 22:19, 17 February 2008

Related e

Google
Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Wiki Commons
Wikiquote
Wikisource
YouTube
Shop


Featured:
Train wreck at Montparnasse (October 22, 1895) by Studio Lévy and Sons.
Enlarge
Train wreck at Montparnasse (October 22, 1895) by Studio Lévy and Sons.

Introduction à la littérature fantastique, first published in French in 1970 and translated as The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre is a literary history book by Tzvetan Todorov in which he explores the notion of the French fantastique.

Tzvetan Todorov holds that fantastic literature involves an unresolved hesitation between a supernatural (or otherwise paranormal or impossible) solution and a psychological (or realistic) one. His term hesitation is reminiscent of the terms ambiguity and ambivalence used in the definition of the grotesque.

Todorov compares the fantastic with two other ideas: The Uncanny, wherein the phenomenon turns out to have a rational explanation such as in the gothic works of Ann Radcliffe; or the Marvelous, where there truly is a supernatural explanation for the phenomenon.

Contents

Genre-theoretical aspects

Aside from dealing with the question of 'what is fantastic literature,' Tzvetan Todorov's The Fantastic also has a very thorough chapter on the nature of genre and genre theory in general. Todorov starts with a critique of Northrop Frye's concept of genre as elaborated in Anatomy of Criticism.

According to Todorov, the first question in genre theory is:

“Are we entitled to discuss a genre without having studied (or at least read) all the works wich constitute it [the corpus]?”

He answers the question with yes:

“Scientific method allows does not require us to observe every instance of a phenomenon in order to describe it; scientific method proceeds rather by deduction.”

But he also warns that:

“Whatever the number of phenomena (of literary works, in this case) studied, we are never justified in extrapolating universal laws from them.”

After which he goes on to quote Karl Popper and the famous black swan example of inductive vs deductive reasoning:

“no matter how many instances of white swans we have observed, this does not justify the conclusion that swans are white.”

Problem of the corpus

There have been various criticisms regarding The Fantastic's corpus:

French writer Harry Morgan [1] argues that "the famous todorovian concepts are a web of errors and contradictions, [...] accentuated by the fact that the choice of the todorovian corpus is aberrant." Morgan argues that Todorov builds most of his case around French the writers Cazotte, Balzac, Gautier, Mérimée, Villiers de l'Isle-Adam and Maupassant; the Germans Arnim and Hoffmann; the Americans Poe, Bierce and James, but wrongfully excludes all British writers apart from Henry James, including Dickens, Collins, Stevenson, Doyle, Kipling, Stoker, Machen, Blackwood, de la Mare, Hodgson and Dunsany; the Belgians Ray, Owen, Ghelderode; and modern Americans such as Merritt, Lovecraft and Clark Ashton Smith).

Stanislaw Lem in [2] reproaches Todorov’s genre theory and his bibliography, and says "Among its twenty-seven titles we find no Borges, no Verne, no Wells, nothing from modern fantasy: all of SF is represented by two short stories. We get, instead, E.T.A. Hoffmann, Potocki, Balzac, Poe, Gogol, Kafka—and that is about all. What this structural account proclaims to us as the bounds of the fantastic is really quite an antique piece of furniture: the bed of Procrustes."

The fantastic as a means to transgress

Todorov contends that authors had to resort to the fantastic in order to cross boundaries and elude censors.

"for many authors, the supernatural was merely a pre-text to describe things they would never have dared mention in realistic terms. [Peter Penzoldt]" We may doubt that supernatural events are merely pretexts; but there is certainly a degree of truth in this assertion: the fantastic permits us to cross frontiers that are inaccessible so long as we have no recourse to it. page 158

Todorov compares a story by Gautier on necrophilia with Georges Bataille's frank account in realistic terms of a necrophiliac near-encounter in Le Bleu du Ciel.

"There is a qualitative difference between the personal possibilities of a nineteenth-century author and those of a contemporary author. We may recall the devious means a Gautier had to employ in order to describe his character's necrophilia, the whole ambiguous business of vampirism." -- page 159

That this pretext-function of the fantastic was no longer necessary, he attributes to the rise of psychoanalysis:

"Psychoanalysis has replaced (and thereby has made useless) the literature of the fantastic. There is no need today to resort to the devil in order to speak of an excessive sexual desire, and none to resort to vampires in order to designate the attraction exerted by corpses: psychoanalysis, and the literature which is directly or indirectly inspired by it, deal with these matters in undisguised terms." -- page 160,161

But in the end, he does not wish to map psychoanalysis onto the fantastic:

"In doing so, we have not tried to establish a relation of signification between the two groups (such as: the devil means sex; the vampire means necrophilia) but rather a compatibility, a co-presence." -- page 143

The marvelous and uncanny: supernatural accepted and supernatural explained

Throughout the work, Todorov tries to make a distinction between fantastique, marvelous and uncanny, most of this based on his hesitation paradigm. The website A Glossary of Literary Gothic Terms maps the hesitation paradigm to the gothic novel, and the website "Uncanny and the Fantastic." compares the works of Horace Walpole and Clara Reeves to illustrate the difference between "marvelous" and "uncanny" works. The site concludes that The Castle of Otranto resides in the genre of the marvelous, or supernatural accepted, adopting new laws of nature for the setting and circumstances but argues that Clara Reeves's works, on the other hand, fall into the genre of the uncanny, or supernatural explained, citing known laws of nature as reasons for the phenomena described.

Quoting from Todorov:

"In a world which is indeed our world, the one we know....there occurs an event which cannot be explained by the laws of this same familiar world. The person who experiences the event must opt for one of two possible solutions: either he is the victim of an illusion of the senses, of a product of the imagination-- and the laws of the world then remain what they are; or else the event has indeed taken place, it is an integral part of reality--but then this reality is controlled by laws unknown to us (p. 25)."
"The fantastic occupies the duration of this uncertainty....The fantastic is that hesitation experienced by a person who knows only the laws of nature, confronting an apparently supernatural event (p. 25)."

Todorov later comments:

"The fantastic requires the fulfillment of three conditions. First, the text must oblige the reader to consider the world of the characters as a world of living persons and to hesitate between a natural or supernatural explanation of the events described. Second, this hesitation may also be experienced by a character; thus the reader's role is so to speak entrusted to a character, and at the same time the hesitation is represented, it becomes one of the themes of the work--in the case of naive reading, the actual reader identifies himself with the character. Third, the reader must adopt a certain attitude with regard to the text: he will reject allegorical as well as "poetic" interpretations (p. 33)."

On the uncanny he says

"[In the uncanny], events are related which may be readily accounted for by the laws of reason, but which are, in one way or another, incredible, extraordinary, shocking, singular, disturbing or unexpected, and which thereby provoke in the character and in the reader a reaction similar to that which works of the fantastic have made familiar (p. 46)." Todorov's definition of the uncanny might be applied to stories in which the character realizes s/he is mad or has just awakened from a dream. Thus, the uncanny is an "experience of limits."
"If we move to the other side of that median line which we have called the fantastic, we find ourselves in the fantastic-marvelous, the class of narratives that are presented as fantastic and that end with an acceptance of the supernatural (p. 52)."


On Lem on Todorov

Historically speaking, prior to what we refer to as the "Enlightenment," there could be no such hesitation. The supernatural was accepted as a part of life. Witches and God co-existed with men and women, and a story could, in Todorov's terms, be "marvelous," but never "fantastic." Examples abound: Sinbad the Sailor, fairy tales, chivalric romances. At the other end—our end—of the nineteenth century, with the psychoanalytic discovery of the unconscious, there is again no hesitation. The witness to bizarre events, or at least the reader of the story, knows them to be the creations of his or her own mind. A story then may be "strange" (étrange, inexplicably translated as "uncanny" by Richard Howard), but, again, never "fantastic," science fiction and Todorov's careless remarks about it notwithstanding. For Todorov, science-fiction is a species of the marvelous, but the sense in which "robots, extraterrestrial beings, the whole interplanetary context" are supernatural is entirely different. Here the marvelous and the strange intersect without creating that cognitive hesitation characteristic of the fantastic, for the explanation of the events, while currently impossible (we as yet know no interplanetary beings) is implicitly rational (we recognize the possibility that we will know such beings in another time). --http://www.depauw.edu/sfs/backissues/6/lemtodorov6forum.htm

From Terry Heller's 1987 Delights of Terror:

   In the marvelous tale, according to Todorov, events take place that violate the reader's conceptions of natural laws, but the characters behave as if the events were normal. Both Todorov and Rabkin point out that this is the fictional world of the fairy tale. Indeed, in "Hansel and Gretel," no one questions the existence of a rich witch in the woods who builds a house out of food to trap children or of a white bird to lead the children to her or of a duck to help ferry them back home. Likewise in Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles (1950), there are no questions about the possibility of space travel, though it had not yet happened when the book was published. The existence of Martians, the physical conditions on Mars, the possibilities of interactions between humans and Martians -- these are just as marvelous as witches and obedient wild ducks. Bringing science fiction and fantasy into the marvelous along with fairy tales, shows the mode's extensiveness. We might go even further by mentioning the marvelous sympathy among some members of the Bundren family in Faulkner's As I Lay Dying or the marvelous power of poetic justice in Austen's Pride and Prejudice. Like Todorov's uncanny genre, his marvelous genre shades off into all of literature, where the marvelous appears in many guises, depending to some extent on what constitutes natural law for any particular cultural group. --http://www.public.coe.edu/~theller/essays/delights/dt3.html [Jun 2006] 

See also: gothic novel - Todorov - fantastic literature - uncanny

SIPs

fantastic - fantastique - fantastic literature - genre theory - gothic novel - the uncanny - Tzvetan Todorov - the marvelous - literary theory - structuralism


Similar products

  1. The Uncanny (Penguin Classics) by Sigmund Freud
  2. Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion (New Accents) by Rose Jackson
  3. Powers of Horror (European Perspectives Series) by Julia Kristeva
  4. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method by Gerard Genette

External links




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on original research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools