White Elephant Art vs. Termite Art  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 20:36, 4 February 2019
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 20:36, 4 February 2019
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 4: Line 4:
"Termite-tapeworm-fungus-moss art," Farber contends, "goes always forward eating its own boundaries, and, like as not, leaves nothing in its path other than the signs of eager, industrious, unkempt activity." "Termite-tapeworm-fungus-moss art," Farber contends, "goes always forward eating its own boundaries, and, like as not, leaves nothing in its path other than the signs of eager, industrious, unkempt activity."
==See also== ==See also==
-*"[[In Praise of Termites]]" (2004) +*"[[In Praise of Termites]]" (2004) by Franklin Bruno
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 20:36, 4 February 2019

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

"White Elephant Art vs. Termite Art" is a film essay by Manny Farber, which originally appeared in Film Culture in 1962, collected in the anthology Negative Space. In it he writes on the virtues of "termite art" and the excesses of "white elephant art," and eloquently champions the B film and under-appreciated auteurs, which he felt were able, termite-like, to burrow into a topic. Bloated, pretentious, white elephant art lacks the economy of expression found in the greatest works of termite art.

"Termite-tapeworm-fungus-moss art," Farber contends, "goes always forward eating its own boundaries, and, like as not, leaves nothing in its path other than the signs of eager, industrious, unkempt activity."

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "White Elephant Art vs. Termite Art" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools