Adam and Eve (visual arts)  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:38, 30 August 2010
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Line 1: Line 1:
 +{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
 +| style="text-align: left;" |
 +"Of the Picture of [[Adam and Eve]] with [[Navel]]s. Another mistake there may be in the Picture of our first Parents, who after the manner of their posterity are both delineated with a [[Navel]]. And this is observable not only in ordinary and stained pieces, but in the Authentick draughts of [[Urbin]], [[Angelo]] and others. Which notwithstanding cannot be allowed, except we impute that unto the [[first cause]], which we impose not on the second; or what we deny unto nature, we impute unto Naturity it self; that is, that in the first and most accomplished piece, the [[Creator]] affected superfluities, or ordained parts without use or office."--''[[Pseudodoxia Epidemica]]'' (1646) by Thomas Browne
 +|}
 +[[Image:Adam and Eve, temptation and banishment (Sistine Chapel ceiling by Michelangelo).jpg|thumb|200px|''[[Adam and Eve: temptation and banishment (Sistine Chapel ceiling by Michelangelo)|Adam and Eve: temptation and banishment]]'' ([[1500s]]) of the [[Sistine Chapel ceiling ]] by [[Michelangelo]]. It is a [[panel]] from [[Adam and Eve on the Sistine Chapel ceiling|Adam and Eve cycle]]]]
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-''[[Adam and Eve]]''+[[Adam and Eve]] were used by [[early Renaissance art]]ists as a theme to represent [[female nude|female]] and [[male nude]]s. Later, the nudity was objected to by more modest elements, and [[fig leaves]] were added to the older pictures and sculptures, covering their [[genital]]s. The choice of the [[fig]] was a result of Mediterranean traditions identifying the unnamed ''[[Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil]]'' as a fig tree, and since fig leaves were actually mentioned in [[Genesis 3]] as being used to cover Adam and Eve's nudity.
-''[[Adam and Eve (visual arts)]]''+==Omphalos theory==
-''[[Adam and Eve (Dürer)]]''+Treating the concept of Adam and Eve as the historical truth introduces some logical dilemmas. One such dilemma is whether they should be depicted with [[navel]]s (The [[Omphalos (theology)|Omphalos theory]]). Since they were created fully grown, and did not develop in a uterus, they would not have been connected to an umbilical chord as were all born humans. Paintings without navels looked unnatural and some artists obscure that area of their bodies, sometimes by depicting them covering up that area of their body with their hand or some other intervening object.
-<hr>+==Nudity==
-[[Genesis (full text from Authorized King James Version of the Bible)]]+[[Lucas Cranach the Elder]] depicts a nude Eve on a [[panel painting]] housed at the [[Musées Royaux des Beaux-Arts]]. [[Hans Baldung Grien]] has a very sensual rendition of the subject. The rendition of the [[Van Eyck]]s in the ''[[Ghent Altarpiece]]'' is purely in [[the alternative convention]] of gothic body shape.
-[[Authorized King James Version of the Bible]]+===Fig leaf images[http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/31/assets/images/jacobs2.jpg]===
-<hr>+Left column, from top to bottom:
-[[User:Jahsonic/2010 released by Creation Books]]+*[[Hugo van der Goes]], [[The Fall of Man]], ca. 1470.[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hugo_van_der_Goes_009.jpg]
-New releases from [[Creation Books]].+*[[Lucas Cranach the Elder]], [[Adam and Eve]], ca. 1510.[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cranach%27s_Adam_and_Eve]
 +*[[Peter Paul Rubens]], [[Adam and Eve]], 1599. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rubens_Painting_Adam_Eve.jpg]
 +*[[Meister Bertram von Minden]], The Grabow Altarpiece, ca. 1383.[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Meister_Bertram_von_Minden_009.jpg]
 +*Peter Paul Rubens, Adam and Eve, 1599. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rubens_Painting_Adam_Eve.jpg]
 +*[[Titian]], Adam and Eve, ca. 1550.
-"THE NUN" by [[Count D'Irancy]]+Right column, from top to bottom:
-The legendary underground novel of sex, sacrilege and depravity in a convent is now published in its first ever English translation. For adults only.+*[[Hans Baldung Grien]], Adam and Eve, 1507.[http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/baldung/adam-eve/adam-eve-uffizi.jpg]
-<hr>+*[[Hubert and Jan van Eyck]], [[The Ghent Altarpiece]], ca. 1432.[http://www.lib-art.com/imgpainting/2/1/10012-the-ghent-altarpiece-adam-cain-an-jan-van-eyck.jpg]
-*[[Willie Mitchell]] -[[That Driving Beat]]+*[[Jan Gossaert]], Adam and Eve, ca. 1520. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adao_eva.PNG]
-*[[Frankie ( loveman ) Crocker]] - [[Ton of Dynamite]] +*[[Lucas Cranach the Elder]], Adam and Eve, 1528.[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cranach_-_Adam_and_Eve_1528.jpg]
 +*[[Hans Memling]], Adam and Eve, ca. 1485. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hans_Memling_079b.JPG]
 +*Hubert and Jan van Eyck, The Ghent Altarpiece, ca. 1432. [http://jahsonic.tumblr.com/post/215503784/eve-in-the-ghent-altarpiece-by-jan-van-eyck-via]
 +Source: [http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/31/jacobs.php]
 +
 +==See also==
 +*[[Expulsion from the Garden of Eden]]
 +*[[Adam and Eve (Dürer)]]
 +*''[[Adam and Eve (1924) Marcel Duchamp and Bronja Perlmutter]]''
 +*[[Adam and Eve: temptation and banishment (Sistine Chapel ceiling by Michelangelo)]]
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Current revision

"Of the Picture of Adam and Eve with Navels. Another mistake there may be in the Picture of our first Parents, who after the manner of their posterity are both delineated with a Navel. And this is observable not only in ordinary and stained pieces, but in the Authentick draughts of Urbin, Angelo and others. Which notwithstanding cannot be allowed, except we impute that unto the first cause, which we impose not on the second; or what we deny unto nature, we impute unto Naturity it self; that is, that in the first and most accomplished piece, the Creator affected superfluities, or ordained parts without use or office."--Pseudodoxia Epidemica (1646) by Thomas Browne

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Adam and Eve were used by early Renaissance artists as a theme to represent female and male nudes. Later, the nudity was objected to by more modest elements, and fig leaves were added to the older pictures and sculptures, covering their genitals. The choice of the fig was a result of Mediterranean traditions identifying the unnamed Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil as a fig tree, and since fig leaves were actually mentioned in Genesis 3 as being used to cover Adam and Eve's nudity.

Contents

Omphalos theory

Treating the concept of Adam and Eve as the historical truth introduces some logical dilemmas. One such dilemma is whether they should be depicted with navels (The Omphalos theory). Since they were created fully grown, and did not develop in a uterus, they would not have been connected to an umbilical chord as were all born humans. Paintings without navels looked unnatural and some artists obscure that area of their bodies, sometimes by depicting them covering up that area of their body with their hand or some other intervening object.

Nudity

Lucas Cranach the Elder depicts a nude Eve on a panel painting housed at the Musées Royaux des Beaux-Arts. Hans Baldung Grien has a very sensual rendition of the subject. The rendition of the Van Eycks in the Ghent Altarpiece is purely in the alternative convention of gothic body shape.

Fig leaf images[1]

Left column, from top to bottom:

Right column, from top to bottom:

Source: [13]


See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Adam and Eve (visual arts)" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools