Art and Its Objects
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
Revision as of 20:12, 17 April 2018 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5" | {| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5" | ||
| style="text-align: left;" | | | style="text-align: left;" | | ||
- | "The crucial question to ask of [[institutional theory of art|the definition]] is this: Is it to be presumed that those who confer status upon some artifact do so for good reasons, or bad reasons, or is there no such presumption? Might they have no reason, or bad reasons, and yet their action be efficacious given that they themselves have the right status – that is, they represent the [[artworld]]?" -- Richard Wollheim, ''[[Art and Its Objects]]'' 2nd ed., 1980, p.160). | + | "‘What is art?’ ‘Art is the sum or totality of [[Work of art|works of art]].’ ‘What is a work of art?’ ‘A work of art is a poem, a painting, a piece of music, a sculpture, a novel. ...’ ‘What is a poem? a painting? a piece of music? a sculpture? a novel? ...’ ‘A poem is ..., a painting is ..., a piece of music is ..., a sculpture is ..., a novel is ...’ It would be natural to assume that, if only we could fill in the gaps in the last line of this dialogue, we should have an answer to one of the most elusive of the traditional problems of human culture: the [[nature of art]]." -- Richard Wollheim, ''[[Art and Its Objects]]'', p.1 |
<hr> | <hr> | ||
- | "‘What is art?’ ‘Art is the sum or totality of [[works of art]].’ ‘What is a work of art?’ ‘A work of art is a poem, a painting, a piece of music, a sculpture, a novel. ...’ ‘What is a poem? a painting? a piece of music? a sculpture? a novel? ...’ ‘A poem is ..., a painting is ..., a piece of music is ..., a sculpture is ..., a novel is ...’ It would be natural to assume that, if only we could fill in the gaps in the last line of this dialogue, we should have an answer to one of the most elusive of the traditional problems of human culture: the [[nature of art]]." -- Richard Wollheim, ''[[Art and Its Objects]]'', p.1 | + | "That there is a [[object|physical object]] that can be identified as ''[[Ulysses (novel)|Ulysses]]'' or ''[[Der Rosenkavalier]]'' is not a view that can long survive the demand that we should pick out or point to that object." -- Richard Wollheim, ''[[Art and Its Objects]]'', p.4 |
<hr> | <hr> | ||
- | "That there is a [[physical object]] that can be identified as ''[[Ulysses]]'' or ''[[Der Rosenkavalier]]'' is not a view that can long survive the demand that we should pick out or point to that [[object]]." -- Richard Wollheim, ''[[Art and Its Objects]]'', p.4 | + | "The crucial question to ask of [[institutional theory of art|the definition]] is this: Is it to be presumed that those who confer status upon some artifact do so for good reasons, or bad reasons, or is there no such presumption? Might they have no reason, or bad reasons, and yet their action be efficacious given that they themselves have the right status – that is, they represent the [[artworld]]?" -- Richard Wollheim, ''[[Art and Its Objects]]'' 2nd ed., 1980, p.160). |
|} | |} | ||
{{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
- | ''[[Art and Its Objects]]'' (1980) is a book [[Richard Wollheim]] on the [[nature of art]]. | + | ''[[Art and Its Objects]]'' (1968) is a book [[Richard Wollheim]] on the [[nature of art]]. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[La Donna Velata]] | *[[La Donna Velata]] | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*[[Ernst Gombrich]]'s ''[[Meditations on a Hobbyhorse and other Essays on the Theory of Art]]'' and ''[[Art and Illusion]]'' | *[[Ernst Gombrich]]'s ''[[Meditations on a Hobbyhorse and other Essays on the Theory of Art]]'' and ''[[Art and Illusion]]'' | ||
*[[Hegel]]'s ''[[Philosophy of Fine Art]]'' | *[[Hegel]]'s ''[[Philosophy of Fine Art]]'' | ||
+ | *[[Ontology of art]] | ||
{{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} |
Current revision
"‘What is art?’ ‘Art is the sum or totality of works of art.’ ‘What is a work of art?’ ‘A work of art is a poem, a painting, a piece of music, a sculpture, a novel. ...’ ‘What is a poem? a painting? a piece of music? a sculpture? a novel? ...’ ‘A poem is ..., a painting is ..., a piece of music is ..., a sculpture is ..., a novel is ...’ It would be natural to assume that, if only we could fill in the gaps in the last line of this dialogue, we should have an answer to one of the most elusive of the traditional problems of human culture: the nature of art." -- Richard Wollheim, Art and Its Objects, p.1 "That there is a physical object that can be identified as Ulysses or Der Rosenkavalier is not a view that can long survive the demand that we should pick out or point to that object." -- Richard Wollheim, Art and Its Objects, p.4 "The crucial question to ask of the definition is this: Is it to be presumed that those who confer status upon some artifact do so for good reasons, or bad reasons, or is there no such presumption? Might they have no reason, or bad reasons, and yet their action be efficacious given that they themselves have the right status – that is, they represent the artworld?" -- Richard Wollheim, Art and Its Objects 2nd ed., 1980, p.160). |
Related e |
Featured: |
Art and Its Objects (1968) is a book Richard Wollheim on the nature of art.
See also
- La Donna Velata
- San Giorgio (Donatello)
- Heinrich Wölfflin's descriptions of The Expulsion of Heliodorus from the Temple
References
- Émile Chartier's Système des Beaux-Arts (1920)
- Adrian Stokes
- Kant's aesthetics
- Ernst Gombrich's Meditations on a Hobbyhorse and other Essays on the Theory of Art and Art and Illusion
- Hegel's Philosophy of Fine Art
- Ontology of art