Dating the Bible
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
Related e |
Featured: |
The Bible is a compilation of various texts or "books" of different ages.
The dates of many of the texts of the Hebrew Bible (or Old Testament) are difficult to establish. Textual criticism places all of them within the 1st millennium BC, although there is considerable uncertainty as to the century in some cases. The oldest surviving Hebrew Bible manuscripts date to about the 2nd century BC (fragmentary), the oldest record of the complete text survives in Greek translation, dating to the 4th century (Codex Sinaiticus) and the oldest extant manuscripts of the vocalized Masoretic text upon which modern editions are based date to the 9th century AD.
The individual books of the New Testament may be dated with some confidence to the 1st and 2nd centuries AD. The earliest fragment of the New Testament is the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, a piece of the Gospel of John dated to the first half of the 2nd century. For this reason, dating the composition of the texts relies on textual criticism, philological and linguistic evidence, as well as direct references to historical events in the texts instead of dating the physical manuscripts.
Contents |
The Hebrew Bible
The authorship of the various texts in Tanakh (the Hebrew Bible) is an open topic of research. Therefore, assigning solid dates to any of the texts is difficult.
The range of dates assigned to the Torah (Pentateuch) is rather broad. It is certain to predate the 2nd century BC, and estimates of its oldest elements range from the 15th to the 6th centuries BC. The bulk of the Tanakh was likely complete by the end of the Babylonian captivity (537 BC).
Torah
The religious view on the origin of the Torah is that it was written by Moses between 1446 BC and 1406 BC. While this view is still held by conservative Christians and Jews, modern scholars agree that the whole of the Torah was composed in the mid-1st millennium BC as a "prequel" to the prophetic books (books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings). There are currently three broad approaches to the question the date and method of its composition. The documentary hypothesis holds that the Torah was composed by interweaving four originally separate and complete narratives, each dealing with the same material: this, it is claimed, accounts for many of the puzzling features of the five books, notably the appearance of multiple names for God and doubled incidents. The documentary hypothesis held a near-monopoly on scholarly approaches to the date and composition of the Torah until the last quarter of the 20th century, since when many scholars have advanced alternative theories which can be grouped unto two broad models: the first is the "fragmentary" model, which holds that the Torah grew gradually from a host of fragments of various lengths; the alternative view is the "supplementary" model, which holds that it is largely the work of an "editor", or group of editors, working on ("supplementing") a mass of existing material.
- Views on Torah
View | Proposed Date |
---|---|
Religious View | Torah composed between 1446 BC and 1406 BC, with the remaining books composed between 1400 BC to 400 BC. |
Documentary hypothesis | Four independent documents (the Jahwist, Elohist, Deuteronomist and the Priestly source), composed between 900-550 BC, redacted c 450 BC, possibly by Ezra |
Supplementary models (e.g. John Van Seters) | Torah composed as a series of authorial expansions of an original source document, usually identified as J or P, largely during the 7th and 6th centuries BC, final form achieved c. 450 BC. |
Fragmentary models (e.g. Rolf Rendtorff, Erhard Blum) | Torah the product of the slow accretion of fragmentary traditions, (no documents), over period 850-550 BC, final form c. 450 BC. |
Biblical minimalism | Torah composed in Hellenistic-Hasmonean period, c. 300-140 BC. |
Nevi'im
The major Nevi'im ("Prophets").
The Books of Kings mentions the following sources:
- The "book of the acts of Solomon" (1 Kings 11:41)
- The "book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah" (14:29; 15:7, 23, etc.)
- The "book of the chronicles of the kings of Israel" (14:19; 15:31; 16:14, 20, 27, etc.).
The date of its composition was perhaps some time between 561 BC, the date of the last chapter (2 Kings 25), when Jehoiachin was released from captivity by Evil-merodach, and 538 BC, the date of the decree of deliverance by Cyrus the Great.
The Book of Isaiah, in its present form, is by most scholars considered the result of an extensive editing process, in which the promises of God's salvation are reinterpreted and claimed for the Judean people through the history of their exile and return to the land of Judah. Very few scholars dispute these conclusions and argue for multiple authors. When the Septuagint version was made (about 250 BC), the entire contents of the book were ascribed to Isaiah, the son of Amoz. In the time of Jesus, the book existed in its present form, with many prophecies in the disputed portions quoted in the New Testament as the words of Isaiah.
Book of Nevi'im | Scholarly datingTemplate:Citation needed |
---|---|
Book of Joshua | ca. 625 BC by the Deuteronomist (called D) working with traditional materials |
Book of Judges | ca. 625 BC by the Deuteronomist (called D) working with traditional materials |
Book of Samuel | ca. 625 BC by the Deuteronomist (called D) working with traditional materials |
Book of Kings | ca. 625 BC by the Deuteronomist (called D) working with traditional materials |
Book of Isaiah | Three main authors and an extensive editing process: Isaiah 1-39 "Historical Isaiah" with multiple layers of editing, 8th cent. BC |
Book of Jeremiah | late 6th century BC or later |
Book of Ezekiel | 6th century BC or later |
Book of Hosea | 8th century BC or later |
Book of Joel | unknown |
Book of Amos | 8th century BC or later |
Book of Obadiah | 6th century BC or later |
Book of Jonah | 6th century BC or later |
Book of Micah | mid 6th century BC or later |
Book of Nahum | 8th century BC or later |
Book of Habakkuk | 6th century BC or later |
Book of Zephaniah | 7th century BC or later |
Book of Haggai | 5th century BC or later |
Book of Zechariah | 5th century BC or later |
Book of Malachi | Early 5th century BC or later |
Ketuvim (Hagiographia)
Scholarship on the dating of the Book of Daniel largely falls into two camps: one dates the book in its entirety to a single author during the desecration of the Jerusalem Temple (167–164 BC) under the Syrian-Greek ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes (ruled 175–164 BC); the other sees it as a collection of stories dating from different times throughout the Hellenistic period (with some of the material possibly going back to very late Persian period), with the visions in chapters 7–12 having been added during the desecration of Antiochus. For example, Hartman and Di Lella, 1978 suggest multiple authorship, with some material dating to the 3rd century, culminating with a 2nd-century editor and redactor.
The reasons for these dates include a use of Greek and Persian words in the Hebrew of the text unlikely to happen in the 6th century, that the style of the Hebrew and Aramaic was more like that of a later date, that the use of the word "Chaldean" occurs in a fashion unknown to the 6th century, and that repeated historical gaffes betray an ignorance of the facts of the 6th century that a high official in Babylon would not have, while the 2nd-century history was found to be far more accurate (see Ferrell Till's analysis).
John Collins, on the other hand, finds it impossible for the "court tales" portion of Daniel to have been written in 2nd century BC because of textual analysis. In his 1992 Anchor Bible Dictionary entry for the Book of Daniel, he states, "it is clear that the court-tales in chapters 1–6 were 'not written in Maccabean times'. It is not even possible to isolate a single verse which betrays an editorial insertion from that period."
Book of Ketuvim | Scholarly datingTemplate:Citation needed |
---|---|
Psalms | The bulk of the Psalms appear to have been written for use in the Temple, which existed from around 950-586 BC and, after rebuilding, from the 5th century BC until AD 70. |
Book of Proverbs | Some old material from the ancient sages, some later material from the 6th century BC or later, some material borrowed from the ancient Egyptian text called the Instructions of Amenemopet |
Book of Job | 5th century BC |
Song of Songs or Song of Solomon | scholarly estimates vary between 950 BC to 200 BC |
Book of Ruth | 6th century BC or later |
Lamentations | 6th century BC or later |
Ecclesiastes | 4th century BC or later |
Book of Esther | 4th century BC or later |
Book of Daniel | mid 2nd century BC |
Book of Ezra-Book of Nehemiah | 4th century BC or slightly later |
Chronicles | 4th century BC or slightly later |
Deuterocanonical books
Deuterocanonical books are books considered by the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodoxy to be canonical parts of the Christian Old Testament but are not present in the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) and Protestant Bible.
Book of Deuterocanon | Scholarly dating |
---|---|
Tobit | 2nd century BC |
Judith | |
1 Maccabees | ca. 100 BC |
2 Maccabees | ca. 124 BC |
3 Maccabees | 1st century BC or 1st century AD |
4 Maccabees | 1st century BC or 1st century AD |
Wisdom | during the Jewish Hellenistic period |
Sirach | 2nd century BC |
Letter of Jeremiah | unknown |
Additions to Daniel | 2nd century BC |
Baruch | during or shortly after the period of the Maccabees |
Oldest manuscripts
The oldest known preserved fragment of a Torah text is a good luck charm inscribed with a text close to, although not identical with, the Priestly Blessing found in Num 6:24–27, dated to approximately 600 BC The oldest complete or nearly complete texts are found in the Dead Sea Scrolls from the middle of the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD. The collections contain all the books of the Tanakh except for the Book of Esther, although not all are complete.
The Tanakh including the Deuterocanonical books was translated into Greek (the Septuagint, or LXX, from the traditional number of translators) between the 3rd and 1st century BC. The oldest Greek manuscripts include 2nd century BC fragments of Leviticus and Deuteronomy and 1st century BC fragments of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and the Minor Prophets. Relatively complete manuscripts of the Septuagint include the Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209 and the Codex Sinaiticus of the 4th century and the Codex Alexandrinus of the 5th century—these are the oldest surviving nearly complete manuscripts of the Old Testament in any language.
The Hebrew or Masoretic text of the Torah is held by tradition to have been assembled in the 4th century AD, but the oldest extant complete or near-complete manuscripts are the Aleppo Codex, ca. 920 AD, and the Westminster Leningrad Codex, dated to 1008 AD.
Additional manuscripts include the Samaritan Torah and the Peshitta, the latter a translation of the Christian Bible into Syriac, the earliest known copy of which dates to the 2nd century AD.
The New Testament
The most accepted historical understanding of how the Synoptic gospels developed is known as the two-source hypothesis. This theory holds that Mark is the oldest gospel. Matthew and Luke are believed to come later, and draw on Mark and also on a source that is now believed to be lost, called the Q document, or just "Q".
Traditional views assume that the bulk of New Testament texts date to the period between AD 45 and AD 100, with the Pauline epistles among the earliest texts. Other views may pre- or post-date the individual books by several decades. The earliest preserved fragment for each text is included as well.
Book | Scholarly Opinions | Earliest preserved fragment |
---|---|---|
Gospel of Matthew | AD 60-85 | 𝔓104 (AD 150 – 200) |
Gospel of Mark | AD 60-70 | 𝔓88 (AD 350) |
Gospel of Luke | AD 60-90 | 𝔓4, 𝔓75 (AD 175 – 250) |
Gospel of John | AD 80-95 | 𝔓52 (AD 125 – 160) |
Acts | AD 60-90 | 𝔓29, 𝔓45, 𝔓48, 𝔓53, 𝔓91 (AD 250) |
Romans | AD 57–58 | 𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century AD) |
Corinthians | AD 57 | 𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century AD) |
Galatians | AD 45-55 | 𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century AD) |
Ephesians | AD 65 | 𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century AD) |
Philippians | AD 57–62 | 𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century AD) |
Colossians | AD 60+ | 𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century AD) |
1 Thessalonians | AD 50 | 𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century AD) |
2 Thessalonians | AD 50 | 𝔓92 (AD 300) |
Timothy | AD 60-100 | Codex Sinaiticus (AD 350) |
Titus | AD 60-100 | 𝔓32 (AD 200) |
Philemon | AD 56 | 𝔓87 (3rd century AD) |
Hebrews | AD 80-90 | 𝔓46 (late 2nd century or 3rd century AD) |
James | AD 50-200 | 𝔓20, 𝔓23 (early 3rd century AD) |
First Peter | AD 60-96 | 𝔓72 (3rd / 4th century AD) |
Second Peter | AD 60-130 | 𝔓72 (3rd / 4th century AD) |
Epistles of John | AD 90-100 | 𝔓9, Uncial 0232, Codex Sinaiticus (3rd / 4th century AD) |
Jude | AD 66-90 | 𝔓72 (3rd / 4th century AD) |
Revelation | AD 68-100 | 𝔓98 (AD 150 – 200) |
The Gnostic Scriptures
The Nag Hammadi library, a collection of books found in 1945, some refer to as Gnostic Scriptures (which include the Gospel of Thomas), were not accepted as canonical by the orthodox early Christian communities. They were written in Coptic and are generally dated to the 3rd and 4th centuries AD, though the Gospel of Thomas has ignited some debate. The majority of New Testament scholars and historians place composition no earlier than the 2nd century whereas a minority argue dates as early as the 60's.
See also
- Higher Criticism
- Textual Criticism
- Biblical manuscripts
- Torah
- Documentary hypothesis
- The Bible and history
- Synoptic problem
- Markan priority
- Dead Sea Scrolls
- Nag Hammadi library
- Categories of New Testament manuscripts
- Timeline of the Bible