2008 June 16
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 00:52, 6 April 2012 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| :"It’s probably not far fetched to describe our [[popular consciousness]] as, at least in part, Freudian. The “[[Freudian slip]]” is vernacular. A cigar, we all agree, is not always a cigar. Sigmund Freud’s influence on our worldview is incredible. Little of what the father of psychoanalysis argued is, however, scientifically supportable. Instead, most of Freud’s arguments are actually [[intuitive]]. Even though his arguments are more colorful than substantive, we understand what he meant, what he was trying to get at. There is no proof of any [[primal scene]], but such a concept helps us understand something about how the human mind deals with deep seeded [[trauma]]. Boys do not want to [[Oedipus complex|kill their dads so they can fuck their moms]], but, again, an otherwise repressed tension is revealed." [[kulturedrome]][http://www.dymaxionweb.com/kulturedrome/archives/2005_03.html] | :"It’s probably not far fetched to describe our [[popular consciousness]] as, at least in part, Freudian. The “[[Freudian slip]]” is vernacular. A cigar, we all agree, is not always a cigar. Sigmund Freud’s influence on our worldview is incredible. Little of what the father of psychoanalysis argued is, however, scientifically supportable. Instead, most of Freud’s arguments are actually [[intuitive]]. Even though his arguments are more colorful than substantive, we understand what he meant, what he was trying to get at. There is no proof of any [[primal scene]], but such a concept helps us understand something about how the human mind deals with deep seeded [[trauma]]. Boys do not want to [[Oedipus complex|kill their dads so they can fuck their moms]], but, again, an otherwise repressed tension is revealed." [[kulturedrome]][http://www.dymaxionweb.com/kulturedrome/archives/2005_03.html] | ||
| - | <hr> | + | |
| - | [[Go ask the physiognomists, phrenologists, pathognomists and characterologists]] | + | |
| - | <hr> | + | |
| - | [[Steve Albini]]'s documentary at YouTube [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFMU-IFUMOI Most People Don't Know His Name]. | + | |
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Current revision
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
- "It’s probably not far fetched to describe our popular consciousness as, at least in part, Freudian. The “Freudian slip” is vernacular. A cigar, we all agree, is not always a cigar. Sigmund Freud’s influence on our worldview is incredible. Little of what the father of psychoanalysis argued is, however, scientifically supportable. Instead, most of Freud’s arguments are actually intuitive. Even though his arguments are more colorful than substantive, we understand what he meant, what he was trying to get at. There is no proof of any primal scene, but such a concept helps us understand something about how the human mind deals with deep seeded trauma. Boys do not want to kill their dads so they can fuck their moms, but, again, an otherwise repressed tension is revealed." kulturedrome[1]
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "2008 June 16" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.
