Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 09:30, 10 April 2016 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
| + | '''''Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio''''', [[Case citation|236 U.S. 230]] (1915), was a court case decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] in 1915, in which, by a 9-0 vote, the Court ruled that the free speech protection of the [[Ohio Constitution]] — which was substantially similar to the [[First Amendment of the United States Constitution]] — did not extend to [[motion picture]]s. | ||
| - | '''''L'Amore''''' ([[1948 in film|1948]]) is an Italian [[anthology film]] directed by [[Roberto Rossellini]] starring [[Anna Magnani]] and [[Federico Fellini]]. | + | ==See also== |
| + | *[[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 236]] | ||
| + | *[[List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment]] | ||
| + | *''[[Whirlpool of Desire]]'' (1935) French film distributed by [[Arthur Mayer]] and Joseph Burstyn | ||
| - | The film opened to considerable controversy in the [[United States]], which led to a lengthy legal dispute, [[Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson]], that ended up in the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] that ruled in 1952 that film as a form of expression was protected under the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution]]. | ||
| - | In the United States the film was first exhibited in [[New York City]] in November 1950. In December, ''The Ways of Love'' was voted the best foreign language film of 1950 by the [[New York Film Critics Circle]]. The film was condemned by the [[National Legion of Decency]] in 1951 and became a catalyst for a Supreme Court decision on censorship and [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] freedom of speech issues. | ||
| - | ==See also== | ||
| - | *''[[Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio]]'' (1915) U.S. Supreme Court case | ||
| - | *[[Film censorship in the United States]] | ||
| - | *''[[Whirlpool of Desire]]'' (1939) film distributed by Burstyn and [[Arthur Mayer]] | ||
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Current revision
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (1915), was a court case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1915, in which, by a 9-0 vote, the Court ruled that the free speech protection of the Ohio Constitution — which was substantially similar to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution — did not extend to motion pictures.
[edit]
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 236
- List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment
- Whirlpool of Desire (1935) French film distributed by Arthur Mayer and Joseph Burstyn
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.
