Property
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 20:05, 11 October 2012 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 18:37, 27 May 2013 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
| + | ''[[What Is Property?]]'' by [[Pierre Proudhon]]: "[[Property is theft!]]" | ||
| # Something that is [[own]]ed. | # Something that is [[own]]ed. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
| *''[[Ancient Society]]'' by [[Lewis H. Morgan]] | *''[[Ancient Society]]'' by [[Lewis H. Morgan]] | ||
| :"The growth of the idea of [[property]], and the rise of [[monogamy]], furnished motives sufficiently powerful to demand and obtain [a] change in order to bring children into the [[gens]] of their father, and into a participation in the [[inheritance]] of his estate. Monogamy assured the [[paternity]] of children; which was unknown when the gens was instituted, and the exclusion of children from the inheritance was no longer possible. "--from [[Lewis H. Morgan]]'s ''[[Ancient Society]]''. | :"The growth of the idea of [[property]], and the rise of [[monogamy]], furnished motives sufficiently powerful to demand and obtain [a] change in order to bring children into the [[gens]] of their father, and into a participation in the [[inheritance]] of his estate. Monogamy assured the [[paternity]] of children; which was unknown when the gens was instituted, and the exclusion of children from the inheritance was no longer possible. "--from [[Lewis H. Morgan]]'s ''[[Ancient Society]]''. | ||
| - | |||
| - | *''[[What Is Property?]]'' by [[Pierre Proudhon]]: "[[Property is theft!]]" | ||
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 27 May 2013
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
What Is Property? by Pierre Proudhon: "Property is theft!"
- Something that is owned.
- An attribute or abstract quality which is characteristic of a class of objects, see property (philosophy)
See also
- "The growth of the idea of property, and the rise of monogamy, furnished motives sufficiently powerful to demand and obtain [a] change in order to bring children into the gens of their father, and into a participation in the inheritance of his estate. Monogamy assured the paternity of children; which was unknown when the gens was instituted, and the exclusion of children from the inheritance was no longer possible. "--from Lewis H. Morgan's Ancient Society.
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Property" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.
