Sokal affair
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
| Revision as of 16:02, 12 October 2022 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5" | {| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5" | ||
| | style="text-align: left;" | | | style="text-align: left;" | | ||
| - | "There are many [[natural scientist]]s, and especially [[physicist]]s, who continue to reject the notion that the disciplines concerned with social and [[cultural criticism]] can have anything to contribute, except perhaps peripherally, to their research. Still less are they receptive to the idea that the very foundations of their worldview must be revised or rebuilt in the light of such criticism. Rather, they cling to the dogma imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual outlook, which can be summarized briefly as follows: that there exists an [[external world]], whose properties are independent of any individual human being and indeed of humanity as a whole; that these properties are encoded in ''eternal'' physical laws; and that human beings can obtain reliable, albeit imperfect and tentative, knowledge of these laws by hewing to the ''objective'' procedures and epistemological strictures prescribed by the (so-called) [[scientific method]]."--"[[Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity]]" (1996) by Alan D. Sokal | + | "There are many [[natural scientist]]s, and especially [[physicist]]s, who continue to reject the notion that the disciplines concerned with social and [[cultural criticism]] can have anything to contribute, except perhaps peripherally, to their research. Still less are they receptive to the idea that the very foundations of their worldview must be revised or rebuilt in the light of such criticism."--"[[Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity]]" (1996) by Alan D. Sokal |
| - | <hr> | + | |
| - | "Just as [[liberal feminist]]s are frequently content with a minimal agenda of legal and social equality for women and "[[pro-choice]]", so liberal (and even some [[socialist]]) mathematicians are often content to work within the hegemonic [[Zermelo–Fraenkel framework]] (which, reflecting its nineteenth-century liberal origins, already incorporates the axiom of equality) supplemented only by the [[axiom of choice]]."--"[[Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity]]" (1996) by Alan D. Sokal | + | |
| |} | |} | ||
| {{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
| - | The '''Sokal affair''', also called the '''Sokal hoax''', was a [[List of scholarly publishing hoaxes|scholarly publishing hoax]] perpetrated by [[Alan Sokal]], a [[physics]] professor at [[New York University]] and [[University College London]]. In 1996, Sokal submitted an article to ''[[Social Text]]'', an academic journal of [[postmodern]] [[cultural studies]]. The submission was an experiment to test the journal's [[Rigour#Intellectual rigour|intellectual rigor]] and, specifically, to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies – whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as [[Fredric Jameson]] and [[Andrew Ross (sociologist)|Andrew Ross]] – [would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions". | + | The '''Sokal affair''' was a [[List of scholarly publishing hoaxes|scholarly publishing hoax]] perpetrated by [[physics]] professor [[Alan Sokal]] in 1996 when Sokal submitted an article to ''[[Social Text]]'', an academic journal of [[postmodern]] [[cultural studies]]. |
| - | The article, "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity", was published in the ''Social Text'' spring/summer 1996 "[[Science Wars]]" issue. It proposed that [[quantum gravity]] is a social and linguistic construct. At that time, the journal did not practice academic [[peer review]] and it did not submit the article for outside expert review by a physicist. On the day of its publication in May 1996, Sokal revealed in ''[[Lingua Franca (magazine)|Lingua Franca]]'' that the article was a hoax. | + | The submission was an experiment to test the journal's [[Rigour#Intellectual rigour|intellectual rigor]] and, specifically, to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies – whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as [[Fredric Jameson]] and [[Andrew Ross (sociologist)|Andrew Ross]] – [would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions". |
| + | |||
| + | The article, "[[Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity]]" proposed that [[quantum gravity]] as a social and linguistic construct. On the day of its publication in May 1996, Sokal revealed in ''[[Lingua Franca (magazine)|Lingua Franca]]'' that the article was a hoax. | ||
| The hoax sparked a debate about the scholarly merit of [[humanism|humanistic]] commentary about the physical sciences; the influence of [[postmodern philosophy]] on social disciplines in general; academic ethics, including whether Sokal was wrong to deceive the editors and readers of ''Social Text''; and whether ''Social Text'' had exercised appropriate intellectual rigor. | The hoax sparked a debate about the scholarly merit of [[humanism|humanistic]] commentary about the physical sciences; the influence of [[postmodern philosophy]] on social disciplines in general; academic ethics, including whether Sokal was wrong to deceive the editors and readers of ''Social Text''; and whether ''Social Text'' had exercised appropriate intellectual rigor. | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| * ''[[Politics and the English Language]]'' (1946), by [[George Orwell]], criticizing the use of verbose language in contemporary political British writing. | * ''[[Politics and the English Language]]'' (1946), by [[George Orwell]], criticizing the use of verbose language in contemporary political British writing. | ||
| * [[Physics envy]] | * [[Physics envy]] | ||
| + | * ''[[Fashionable Nonsense]]'' | ||
| + | *Valerie Greenberg, ''[[Transgressive Readings]]'' (1990) | ||
| + | *[[Stanley Aronowitz]], ''[[Science as Power]]'' (1988) | ||
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Current revision
|
"There are many natural scientists, and especially physicists, who continue to reject the notion that the disciplines concerned with social and cultural criticism can have anything to contribute, except perhaps peripherally, to their research. Still less are they receptive to the idea that the very foundations of their worldview must be revised or rebuilt in the light of such criticism."--"Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" (1996) by Alan D. Sokal |
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
The Sokal affair was a scholarly publishing hoax perpetrated by physics professor Alan Sokal in 1996 when Sokal submitted an article to Social Text, an academic journal of postmodern cultural studies.
The submission was an experiment to test the journal's intellectual rigor and, specifically, to investigate whether "a leading North American journal of cultural studies – whose editorial collective includes such luminaries as Fredric Jameson and Andrew Ross – [would] publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions".
The article, "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" proposed that quantum gravity as a social and linguistic construct. On the day of its publication in May 1996, Sokal revealed in Lingua Franca that the article was a hoax.
The hoax sparked a debate about the scholarly merit of humanistic commentary about the physical sciences; the influence of postmodern philosophy on social disciplines in general; academic ethics, including whether Sokal was wrong to deceive the editors and readers of Social Text; and whether Social Text had exercised appropriate intellectual rigor.
Background
In an interview on the U.S. radio program All Things Considered, Sokal said he was inspired to submit the bogus article after reading Higher Superstition (1994), in which authors Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt claim that some humanities journals would publish anything as long as it had "the proper leftist thought" and quoted (or was written by) well-known leftist thinkers.
Gross and Levitt had been vocal defenders of the scientific realist camp of the "science wars", opposing postmodernist academics who questioned scientific objectivity. They asserted that anti-intellectual sentiment in liberal arts departments (and especially in English departments) caused the rise of deconstructionist thought, which eventually led to a deconstructionist critique of science. They saw the critique as a "repertoire of rationalizations" for avoiding the study of science.
Content of the article
"Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" proposed that quantum gravity has progressive political implications, and that the "morphogenetic field" could be a cutting-edge theory of quantum gravity (a morphogenetic field is a concept adapted by Rupert Sheldrake in a way that Sokal characterized in the affair's aftermath as "a bizarre New Age idea"). Sokal wrote that the concept of "an external world whose properties are independent of any individual human being" was "dogma imposed by the long post-Enlightenment hegemony over the Western intellectual outlook".
After referring skeptically to the "so-called scientific method", the article declared that "it is becoming increasingly apparent that physical 'realityTemplate:'" is fundamentally "a social and linguistic construct". It went on to state that because scientific research is "inherently theory-laden and self-referential", it "cannot assert a privileged epistemological status with respect to counterhegemonic narratives emanating from dissident or marginalized communities" and that therefore a "liberatory science" and an "emancipatory mathematics", spurning "the elite caste canon of 'high scienceTemplate:'", needed to be established for a "postmodern science [that] provide[s] powerful intellectual support for the progressive political project".
Moreover, the article's footnotes conflate academic terms with sociopolitical rhetoric, e.g.:
- Just as liberal feminists are frequently content with a minimal agenda of legal and social equality for women and "pro-choice", so liberal (and even some socialist) mathematicians are often content to work within the hegemonic Zermelo–Fraenkel framework (which, reflecting its nineteenth-century liberal origins, already incorporates the axiom of equality) supplemented only by the axiom of choice.
See also
- Academese
- Bogdanov affair, in which actual scientific papers were accused of being publishing hoaxes
- Grievance studies affair
- Chip Morningstar, a software developer known for his early hoax involving postmodern deconstruction at the 2nd International Conference on Cyberspace in 1991
- Dr. Fox effect, an actor gave a lecture to a group of experts with almost no content but was praised
- List of scholarly publishing hoaxes
- List of scholarly publishing stings
- Paper generator
- Postmodernism Generator, a program that produces imitations of postmodernist writing
- The Ern Malley affair, Australia's most infamous literary hoax
- Fictitious entry
- Not even wrong
- Politics and the English Language (1946), by George Orwell, criticizing the use of verbose language in contemporary political British writing.
- Physics envy
- Fashionable Nonsense
- Valerie Greenberg, Transgressive Readings (1990)
- Stanley Aronowitz, Science as Power (1988)
