The Turkish Bath
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 23:36, 27 January 2008 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 22:25, 28 January 2008 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | [[Image:Turkish Bath by Ingres.jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[The Turkish Bath]]'' ([[1862]]) - [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres]]]] | + | [[Image:Turkish Bath by Ingres.jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[The Turkish Bath]]'' ([[1862]]) - [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres]]]]{{Template}} |
When [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres]], director of the French ''Académie de peinture'' painted a highly-colored vision of a [[turkish bath]] (''illustration, right''), he made his [[eroticize]]d [[Orient]] publicly acceptable by his diffuse generalizing of the female forms, who might all have been of the same model. If his [[painting]] had simply been retitled "In a Paris Brothel," it would have been [[controversial|far less acceptable]]. Sensuality was seen as acceptable in the [[exotic]] Orient. | When [[Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres]], director of the French ''Académie de peinture'' painted a highly-colored vision of a [[turkish bath]] (''illustration, right''), he made his [[eroticize]]d [[Orient]] publicly acceptable by his diffuse generalizing of the female forms, who might all have been of the same model. If his [[painting]] had simply been retitled "In a Paris Brothel," it would have been [[controversial|far less acceptable]]. Sensuality was seen as acceptable in the [[exotic]] Orient. | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[[Bath]] | *[[Bath]] | ||
*[[Art as an excuse for depicting prurient interests]] | *[[Art as an excuse for depicting prurient interests]] | ||
- | {{Template}} | + | [[Category:Icons of erotic art]] |
+ | |||
{{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} |
Revision as of 22:25, 28 January 2008
Related e |
Featured: |
When Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres, director of the French Académie de peinture painted a highly-colored vision of a turkish bath (illustration, right), he made his eroticized Orient publicly acceptable by his diffuse generalizing of the female forms, who might all have been of the same model. If his painting had simply been retitled "In a Paris Brothel," it would have been far less acceptable. Sensuality was seen as acceptable in the exotic Orient.
The Turkish Bath was finished in a rectangular format in 1859, was revised in 1860 before being turned into a tondo. Ingres signed and dated it in 1862, although he made additional revisions in 1863. (Prat, 2004, p. 90.)
See also
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "The Turkish Bath" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.