From Allegories to Novels  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

Revision as of 11:37, 26 September 2017; view current revision
←Older revision | Newer revision→
Jump to: navigation, search

"George Henry Lewes has observed that the only medieval debate of any philosophical value is the debate between nominalism and realism. This opinion is rather temerarious, but it emphasizes the importance of the persistent controversy provoked at the beginning of the ninth century by a sentence from Porphyry, which Boethius translated and annotated: a controversy that Anselm and Roscellinus continued at the end of the eleventh century and that William of Occam reanimated in the fourteenth."


"To the best of my knowledge, the allegorical genre has been analyzed by Schopenhauer (Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, I, 50), by De Quincey (Writings, XI, 198), by Francesco De Sanctis (Storia della letteratura italiana, VII), by Croce (Estetica, 39), and by Chesterton (G. F. Watts, 83). In this essay I shall consider only the last two. Croce denies the allegorical art; Chesterton vindicates it. I agree with the former, but I should like to know how a form we consider unjustifiable could have enjoyed so much favor."

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

"From Allegories to Novels" is an essay by Jorge Luis Borges, collected in the anthology Other Inquisitions 1937-1952.

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "From Allegories to Novels" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools